38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, April 23, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Know The Law

Introduction to Code of Criminal Procedure with Important definitions

By LawStreet News Network      19 December, 2017 01:01 AM      0 Comments

The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is a procedural law, providing machinery for the punishment of offenders against the substantive criminal law. It prescribes the procedure for the trial of offences which the Indian Penal Code defines. Section 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 provides that all offences under the Indian Penal Code shall be investigated, inquired into, tried, and otherwise dealt with according to the provision of this Code. It also provides that offences under a law other than the Indian Penal Code will also be tried according to the provisions of the Code.

Previous to 1882 there was no uniform law of criminal procedure for the whole India. The Criminal Procedure Code of 1882 for the first time gave it a uniform structure, which later on supplemented by a new Code in 1898, which became the basis of the present procedure.

The Act underwent drastic amendments in 1923 and 1955. However, demand for the revision of the Code was made to simplify the procedure and to make the separation of judiciary more effective. The Law Commission, therefore, submitted a revised draft of the Code in its thirteenth report which, was passed into this Code in 1973.

As held in the case of Popular Muthiah v. State, The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is an exhaustive Code and is meant to further the ends of justice and not to frustrate the same.

Important Definitions under the Code

Bailable Offence and Non-bailable Offence

According to section 2(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 bailable offence means an offence which is shown as bailable in the First Schedule of the code and non-bailable offence means any other offence.

In case of bailable offence, a person could claim to be released on bail as a matter of right, which is not the case in non-bailable offences.

Cognizable Offence and Non-cognizable Offence

Cognizable offences as per section 2(c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 are those offences in which the police officer can arrest a person without an arrest warrant and to proceed with the investigation without prior order of the magistrate.

A non-cognizable offence as per section 2(l) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is an offence in which the police officer has no authority to arrest a person without an arrest warrant and also cannot proceed with the investigation without an order of the magistrate.

Complaint

Complaint as per section 2(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973means any allegation made orally or in writing to a magistrate, with a view to his taking action under this Code, that some person, whether known or unknown, has committed an offence, but does not include a police report.

For a document to come within the ambit of this clause, the following conditions have to be satisfied:-

An oral or a written allegation

Some person known or unknown has committed an offence

It must be made to a magistrate

It must be made with an object that he should take action

As held in the case of Mohd. Yousuf v. Afaq Jahan, there is no particular format of a complaint. A petition addressed to a magistrate containing an allegation that an offence has been committed, and ending with a prayer that the culprit be suitably dealt with is a complaint.

Inquiry, Investigation and Trial

These three terms denote three different stages of a criminal case. The first is an investigation which is defined u/s 2(h) of the Code, where the evidence is collected by the police or any other person authorized by a magistrate. In accordance with the investigation, the police submit his report to the magistrate and then begins the second stage an inquiry or a trial. The inquiry is defined u/s 2 (g) of the Code; it is a stage which stops when the trial begins. The inquiry does not require an adjudication upon guilt or determination of an offence, which happens at the stage of the trial.

Now, stop scratching your head, whenever you come across a legal term.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

cant-claim-maintenance-from-man-if-dna-test-shows-non-paternity-supreme-court-of-india
Trending Judiciary
Can’t Claim Maintenance from Man if DNA Test Shows Non-Paternity: Supreme Court of India [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules no maintenance if DNA proves non-paternity; Section 112 presumption yields to scientific evidence when findings attain finality.

22 April, 2026 03:48 PM
pil-against-z-vvip-security-cover-to-rss-chief-mohan-bhagwat-dismissed-as-motivated-petition-and-abuse-of-process-of-law-bombay-hc
Trending Judiciary
PIL Against Z+ VVIP Security Cover to RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat Dismissed as “Motivated Petition” and “Abuse of Process of Law”: Bombay HC [Read Order]

Bombay High Court dismisses PIL against Z+ security for RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, calling it a motivated petition and abuse of process.

22 April, 2026 05:22 PM

TOP STORIES

cci-dismisses-complaint-against-adani-group-in-12-gw-solar-project-case-finds-no-prima-facie-bid-rigging-or-abuse-of-dominance
Trending Business
CCI Dismisses Complaint Against Adani Group in ₹12 GW Solar Project Case, Finds No Prima Facie Bid Rigging or Abuse of Dominance [Read Order]

Competition Commission of India dismisses allegations of bid rigging and abuse of dominance against Adani Group in 12 GW solar project case.

18 April, 2026 02:10 PM
every-sinner-has-a-future-karnataka-hc-reduces-auto-rickshaw-drivers-jail-term-for-robbing-lone-woman-passenger
Trending Judiciary
‘Every Sinner Has a Future’: Karnataka HC Reduces Auto-Rickshaw Driver’s Jail Term for Robbing Lone Woman Passenger [Read Order]

Karnataka HC upholds conviction but reduces sentence of auto driver, directs ₹4 lakh compensation to victim in robbery case.

18 April, 2026 02:20 PM
screening-of-film-dhurandar-cannot-be-stalled-merely-because-a-section-of-society-has-a-different-view-madras-hc-dismisses-pil-seeking-ban-during-tamil-nadu-elections
Trending CelebStreet
Screening of Film Dhurandar Cannot Be Stalled Merely Because a Section of Society Has a Different View: Madras HC Dismisses PIL Seeking Ban During Tamil Nadu Elections [Read Order]

Madras High Court dismisses PIL against Dhurandar: The Revenge, ruling certified films cannot be stalled due to public dissent during elections.

18 April, 2026 03:26 PM
mc-mehta-case-supreme-court-approves-hike-in-environment-compensation-charge-for-commercial-vehicles-entering-delhi-orders-5-annual-revision
Trending Judiciary
MC Mehta Case: Supreme Court Approves Hike in Environment Compensation Charge for Commercial Vehicles Entering Delhi, Orders 5% Annual Revision [Read Order]

Supreme Court approves ECC hike for commercial vehicles entering Delhi, mandates 5% annual increase from April 1, 2026, based on CAQM recommendations.

18 April, 2026 05:12 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email