The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Bench of Ahmedabad has admitted initiation of insolvency proceedings against 'RMOL Engineering and Offshore Ltd' (till recently known as 'Reliance Marine Engineering and Offshore Ltd'), belonging to Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group (ADAG).
The admission was made after Industrial Financial Corporation of India Ltd (IFCI), a public sector financial institution filed
Section 7 petition under the
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code in the year 2017. IFCI had advanced a loan of 202 crores to Pipavav Marine and Offshore Limited in 2013 which was later taken over by Reliance. The company is liable to pay about 200 crores to IFCI. The application was pending since 2017 due to series of adjournments granted by NCLT Ahmadabad. This led IFCI to file an appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Delhi which by its order dated April 11, 2019, directed NCLT Ahmedabad to take up the matter on urgent basis after hearing the 'Corporate Debtor' and pass the appropriate order by April 30, 2019.
However, despite the direction by the NCLAT, the case was further adjourned in two consecutive hearings. The IFCI again approached NCLAT against the grant of adjournment. In appeal, the NCLAT, passed a scathing order as follows:
"In the facts and circumstances, we give last opportunity to Mr. Harihar Prakash Chaturvedi, (Member Judicial) and Ms. Manorama Kumari, (Member Judicial), Adjudicating Authority ('National Company Law Tribunal'), Ahmedabad Bench, Ahmedabad to pass final order by 21st August, 2019 failing which the matter will be referred to the 'President, National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi and the Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs for appropriate orders." In view of the direction, NCLT Ahmedabad conducted day to day hearing and passed the order of insolvency proceedings against RMOL.
NCLT Has No Jurisdiction to Examine Legality of Action Taken Under MPID Act, 1999: Bombay High Court
Judiciary
Nov 23, 2020
Richa Shah
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
7 Shares
The NCLT has no jurisdiction to examine the legality or validity of action taken under MPID Act, 1999 as per the Bombay High Court. It said that it is only the designated Court constituted under Section 6 if the said act that will have exclusive jurisdiction to deal with the same.Division bench consisted of two judges: Justice SC Gupte and Justice Madhav Jamdar. The order dated January 28, 2019 was quashed and set aside the passed by the Member (Judicial), NCLT, Mumbai Bench and they directed...
SC allows Aircel Plea seeking Directions to NCLT to Consider the Questions Framed [READ ORDER]
Judiciary
Oct 06, 2020
Lakshya Tewari
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
9 Shares
Aircel’s plea is been allowed by the Supreme Court to direct the NCLT (National Company Appellate Tribunal) to consider the questions framed by the court in the judgment of AGR case, dated September 1st, 2020. The Supreme Court directed the NCLT to consider questions like, whether TSPs can be said to be the owner based on the right to use them, the question about spectrum and whether the Government hold it as cestui que trust, different provisions about Indian Telegraphic Act, 1885, Indian...
Facebook Comments