38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, December 13, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Apple faces nearly $ 1 billion penalty for ordering too few OLED screens from Samsung

By Manthan Pandit      18 July, 2020 04:15 PM      0 Comments
Apple faces nearly $ 1 billion penalty for ordering too few OLED screens from Samsung

Apple has reportedly charged Samsung a penalty of nearly $1 billion for failing to buy OLED displays as requested. Samsung Display is the main OLED supplier to Apple for its iPhones. 

It was claimed earlier that Apple had paid Samsung about $745 million for failing to meet the purchasing demand for the OLED display. Yet a recent Display Supply Chain study says the liability was only around $950million.

This payment also allegedly boosted Samsung's Q2 revenue with the company estimated to have received a "one-time gain associated with its display business"

Samsung hasn't disclosed the number, but Apple's penalty is estimated to close in at $1 billion. This payment also helped to reverse the loss to a profit for Samsung Display.

Anything like this is not the first time it has happened. Apple too faced a cost last year for not purchasing Samsung's OLED panels as agreed. Apple reportedly charged Samsung some $684 million last year as a penalty.

Weak demand and sales due to Covid-19 are expected to result in Apple not meeting the requirement for OLED panels.

Apple is also expected to move from Samsung Display to China's BOE Tech as its largest iPhone 12 series OLED supplier. Its expected that Apple will launch four iPhone 12 models with 5 G support this year. OLED displays are officially available on all four 5 G iPhones.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM
sc-declines-urgent-relief-in-indigo-flight-cancellation-crisis-says-centre-dgca-already-acting
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines Urgent Relief in IndiGo Flight Cancellation Crisis, Says Centre, DGCA Already Acting

Supreme Court declines urgent intervention in the IndiGo flight-cancellation crisis, noting Centre and DGCA actions under the CAR 2024 framework.

08 December, 2025 05:29 PM
sc-rules-temple-funds-belong-to-the-deity-cannot-be-diverted-to-rescue-cooperative-banks
Trending Judiciary
SC Rules Temple Funds “Belong to the Deity”, Cannot Be Diverted to Rescue Cooperative Banks

Supreme Court rules temple funds belong to the deity and cannot be used to rescue weak cooperative banks; directs return of deposits to Thirunelly Devaswom.

08 December, 2025 05:36 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email