While hearing a writ petition filed by an Advocate seeking suspension of actor Kangana Ranaut's twitter handle for allegedly spreading communal hatred on Thursday,17th December, 2020 the Bombay High Court asked the petitioner whether he was personally affected by the tweets.
A division bench of Justice SS Shinde and Justice MS Karnik adjourned the hearing in the plea filed by Advocate Ali Kaashif Khan Deshmukh earlier this month praying for getting Kangana's twitter account permanently suspended for allegedly spreading continuous hatred, disharmony in the country and attempting to divide the country with her extremist/derogatory tweets and promoting crime in the country, till Monday, December 21. Advocate Ali has previously filed two criminal complaints against the actor, one of them also arraigns Kangana's sister Rangoli Chandel as an accused.
Magistrate’s Order Directing FIR Against Kangana Ranaut for Tweets on Farmers Protest Quashed by Karnataka High Court
CelebStreet
Mar 30, 2021
Tanya Sehrawat
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
3 Shares
An order which was passed by a Magistrate in the State directing the police to register an FIR against Kangana Ranaut over controversial tweets on Farmers Protest was quashed by the Karnataka High Court on Thursday (March 25, 2021).The order was set aside by the Single Judge Bench of Justice HP Sandesh. He said that the Magistrate acted mechanically without properly examining if any offences were made out. Now the matter is remitted back to the Magistrate in order to consider it...
Karnataka HC issues Notice on Kangana Ranaut’s Plea to Quash FIR Over Tweets on Farmer Protests
CelebStreet
Mar 22, 2021
Tanya Sehrawat
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
3 Shares
A petition had been filed by Kangana Ranaut which sought quashing of an FIR registered over her tweets that compared farmers protesting against the farm laws to terrorists. On Friday (March 19, 2021), Karnataka High Court issued a notice on the same. While the case was being heard, Advocate Ramesh Naik L being the respondent in the petition appeared before the HC through video conference. He submitted neither being served the petition and nor the Interlocutory Appeal. He thereby requested...
Facebook Comments