Two Law Students approached the High Court of Karnataka questioning the circular issued by the Karnataka State Law University in so far as it imposes an examination on KSLU intermediate semester law students for the semester from which they have already been promoted.
The petition is lodged by RithvikBalanagraj B. (3rd-year law student at St. Joseph Law College, Bangalore) and Arunkumara H.S. (2nd-year law student at S.B.R.R. Mahajana Law College, Mysore). The petitioners argued that the review would have a disproportionate and adverse effect on students who have not been able to attend classes online for a variety of reasons such as accessibility, remote location, and affordability. They will be essentially required to write tests on topics that have never been taught, which would have a differential impact on these students and would place an extra burden on those individuals that have already been disadvantaged, which would breach Article 14."
Furthermore, it is said that due to the abrupt closure of schools students have lost access to the library and have returned home without any study material in their possession. Students had a reasonable expectation from the university that they would be taught subjects, that they would have access to research materials, and that they would be tested. If a review is carried out bypassing this mechanism, this will be contradictory to this reasonable expectation. The petition was filed by Arnav Bagalwadi, Shathabish Shivanna, Abhishek Janardhan and H.C. Prateek submit that the circular released by BCI and KSLU is inconsistent with the UGC Guideline of April 2019, the UGC Revised Guidelines of 6.07.2020 and the Karnataka Government Order of 10.07.2020 required all universities in the state of Karnataka to assess their intermediate semester students under the assessment formula; where 50% weightage would be in internal evaluation and 50 % weightage would be in marks scored in the previous semester. The law students of KSLU are equally affected by the pandemic and they are also similarly circumstanced. The petition, which is likely to be referred for hearing in due course, asks the Karnataka State Law University to give effect to the Karnataka Government Order of 10.07.2020, which is in line with the UGC Guidelines on Exams. (Schedule 50-50).
Karnataka HC hears PIL Challenging Cattle Slaughter Prevention Ordinance brought in by the Government of Karnataka [READ PETITION]
Judiciary
Jan 14, 2021
Gautami Chakravarty
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
5 Shares
The High Court of Karnataka on 12th January, 2020 heard a petition against a recent ordinance on prevention of cattle slaughter brought by the Government of Karnataka. The petition was filed by Mohammed Arif Jameel challenging the Karnataka Prevention of Slaughter and Preservation of Cattle Ordinance, 2020. The division bench consisted of Chief Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum who issued a notice while hearing the petition. The petitioner’s Advocate Rahamathulla...
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Pleas to Stop Non-Hindus From Working in Offices Under HRICE Act,1997
Judiciary
Dec 16, 2020
Dev Kumar Patel
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
6 Shares
The Karnataka High Court on 14th December 2020 dismissed writ petitions which sought that non-Hindus should not be permitted to work in the office of Commissioners under the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997.A bench headed by Chief Justice Abhay S Okaremarked that "The Hindu religion was never so narrow. Hindu religion as professed never consisted of people who are so narrow minded."Highlighted points of the writ petitions as follows:Strict...
Facebook Comments