38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 24, 2024
Executive

Centre Frames New Rules To Prescribe Uniform Norms For Appointment Of Members To Tribunals [Read Rules]

By LawStreet News Network      15 February, 2020 12:02 PM      0 Comments
Centre Frames New Rules To Prescribe Uniform Norms

The Union Ministry of Finance has framed new rules that have prescribed uniform norms for the appointment and service conditions of members to various tribunals as reported on 14th February, 2020. The rules are called "Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualifications, Experience and other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules 2020" 

These rules are made in exercise of powers under Section 184 of the Finance Act of 2017 - The section authorizes the Central Government to notify rules governing persons appointed to tribunals on the following matters: qualification, appointment, terms of office, salaries and allowances, resignation, removal, and other terms and conditions of service.

The following rules are applicable to the following tribunals : 

  1. Industrial Tribunal constituted by the Central Government under the Industrial Disputes Act 1947.
  2. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal under the Income Tax Act 1961.
  3. Customs, Excise, Service Tax Appellate Tribunal under the Customs Act 1962.
  4. Appellate Tribunal under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act 1976.
  5. Central Administrative Tribunals under the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985
  6. Railway Claims Tribunal under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act 1987.
  7. Securities Appellate Tribunal under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992.
  8. Debts Recovery Tribunal under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act 1993.
  9. Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act 1993.
  10. Airport Appellate Tribunal under the Airport Authority of India Act 1994.
  11. Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal under the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act 1997.
  12. Appellate Board under the Trade Marks Act 1999.
  13. National Company Law Appellate Tribunal under the Companies Act 2013.
  14. Authority for Advance Ruling under the Income Tax Act 1961.
  15. Film Certification Appellate Tribunal under the Cinematograph Act 1956.
  16. National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission under the Consumer Protection Act 1986.
  17. Appellate Tribunal for Electricity under the Electricity Act 2003.
  18. Armed Forces Tribunal under the Armed Forces Act 2007.
  19. National Green Tribunal under the National Green Tribunal Act 2000.

As per the 2020 rules, the appointment to the above-mentioned Tribunals will be made by the Central Government on the recommendations given by "Search cum selection Committee" that is to be constituted by each tribunal. The position of the committee is classified in the schedules of the rules. The Chief Justice of India or a Judge nominated by the CJI will be a member of the committee. The committee has the power to recommend the removal of a member and also conduct inquiry into allegations of a member's misconduct. 

The previous rules framed by the centre in 2017 had been struck down by the Constitution Bench of Supreme Court in November 2019 in the case of Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank.The rules put a hold on the judicial independence as the Central Government had the most say in the matters of appointments and removal of tribunal members. Therefore the selection committee of 2017 lacked the judicial dominance needed to in the appointments and removal of members and this was in contravention to the doctrine of Separation of powers. 

[Read Rules]

Author : Dyuti Pandya 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

denying-child-care-leave-to-working-mothers-of-disabled-children-violated-constitutional-mandate-sc
Trending Judiciary
Denying child care leave to working mothers of disabled children violated constitutional mandate: SC

Supreme Court of India rules denying child care leave for mothers of disabled kids violates constitutional rights.

23 April, 2024 11:15 AM
ignorance-is-not-bliss-okhla-waste-to-energy-plant-needs-to-be-relocated-residents-argue
Trending Environment
Ignorance is not bliss: Okhla Waste to Energy Plant needs to be relocated, residents argue

Questions on the suitability of waste-to-energy plants in Delhi are not new, but the 2,000 tonnes per day Waste to Energy (WTE) plant, situated in the middle of the dense residential areas around Sukhdev Vihar, is not just a major environmental worry but an example of how siting rules can be bent to accommodate a heavily polluting enterprise.

23 April, 2024 12:29 PM

TOP STORIES

pil-filed-by-ashwini-kumar-upadhyay-in-sc-for-yr-bachelor-of-law-degree-after-class
Trending Judiciary
PIL filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in SC for 3-yr Bachelor of Law degree after Class XII

PIL by Ashwini Kumar in SC seeks to shorten law degree to 3 years post-Class XII, citing current 5-year span as irrational.

18 April, 2024 11:21 AM
centre-sets-up-high-powered-committee-to-suggest-measures-to-end-discrimination-against-queer-community
Trending Executive
Centre sets up high-powered committee to suggest measures to end discrimination against queer community [Read Order]

Centre forms committee to end discrimination against the queer community, chaired by the Cabinet Secretary, following a Supreme Court directive.

18 April, 2024 12:11 PM
after-karnataka-hc-delhi-hc-sets-aside-government-circular-banning-23-ferocious-dog-breeds
Trending Judiciary
After Karnataka HC, Delhi HC sets aside Government circular banning 23 'ferocious' dog breeds [Read Judgement]

After Karnataka High Court, the Delhi High Court has set aside a Government circular banning 23 'ferocious' dog breeds.

18 April, 2024 01:06 PM
for-wrong-decision-of-suicide-by-person-of-frail-mentality-who-is-to-be-blamed-delhi-hc-gives-view
Trending Judiciary
For wrong decision of suicide by person of 'frail mentality', who is to be blamed? Delhi HC gives view [Read Judgment]

If a man of 'frail mentality' takes the wrong decision to commit suicide, who is to be blamed? Delhi High Court gives a prima facie opinion in the matter.

18 April, 2024 03:23 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email