38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Karnataka Government Allows CBI To Prosecute Two IPS Officers In Ponzi Scam

By VANDANA KOTHARI      17 September, 2020 03:46 PM      0 Comments
Karnataka Government Allows CBI To Prosecute Two IPS Officers In Ponzi Scam

The I-Monetary Advisory (IMA) ponzi scam in which thousands of investors were duped of their hard-earned after being promised bumper returns, was handed over to the CBI on 30th August 2019. 

It was the case where an investment banking company named IMA took huge deposits primarily from the members of the Muslim community. The company was run by Mahommed Mansoor Khan who claimed it was a sharia-compliant operation run on Islamic principles. The company stopped giving dividends in March 2019. The investors filed a complaint with the police. In June 2019, SIT was set up by the Government of Karnataka for the investigation of 51,500 complaints filed by the investors. 

As the case was handed over to CBI, the CBI sought the state's permission to prosecute a total of six public servants, including the two IPS officers in question.

The list includes the incumbent Inspector-General of Police (IGP) & Additional Commissioner of Police (Administration) of Bengaluru Hemant Nimbalkar who then served as the IGP of Criminal Investigation Department (CID), Economic Offences Division (EOD), Ajay Hilori, a commandant in the state reserve police (then Deputy Commissioner of Police Bengaluru East), E B Sridhara (then Deputy Superintendent of Police, CID in EOD), M Ramesh (then Commercial Street Police Inspector) and P Gowrishankar (then Sub-Inspector of Commercial Street police station).

Hemant Nimbalkar and Ajay Hilori were accused under section 197 of C.r.P.C (Prosecution of Judges and public servants.) & section 170 of Karnataka Police Act 1963 (suits or prosecutions in respect of acts done under color of duty as aforesaid not to be entertained without the sanction of government). 

According to CBI, Nimbalkar who supervised the inquiry stated that the IMA is not a financial establishment under the definition of the KPID Act. Later Nimbalkar reiterated his stand that IMA and its group entities did not violate any provisions of the KPID Act and thus showed undue interest in order to favor Mohammed Mansoor Khan and IMA that he wanted to protect the activities of Shri Mohammed Mansoor Khan and save him from any action by Government under the KPID Act

Hilori demanded and accepted illegal gratification on various occasions from Mohammed Mansoor Khan through Nijamuddin, Director and Operational Manager, IMA for favoring IMA by delaying the report to RBI and for not taking action against IMA on various complaints in connivance with other public servants.

On Monday, September 11, the state government gave CBI permission to prosecute the officers. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email