- Permitting removal of restriction on end-use of minerals;
- Enabling captive mines to sell up to 50% of their annual mineral production in open markets;
- Easing the process of statutory clearances by allowing its transfer from one lessee to another;
- Allowing private companies to enter mining exploration etc.
Speaking on the Bill, Union Minister Pralhad Joshi said that the mining sector in India is very weak. He further said that the reason for this is non-involvement of private companies in this sector. He added that the Bill enables private players having advanced technology to enter exploration and boost the sector.
- The Act empowers the central government to reserve any mine (other than coal, lignite, and atomic minerals) to be leased for a particular end-use, such as iron ore mine for a steel plant. Such mines are known as captive mines. The Bill also provides that no mine will be reserved for a particular end-use.
- Under the Act, states conduct auctions for granting mining leases. The Bill provides that where the State Government has not successfully completed auction process within a specified time, the Central Government may take over and conduct such auction.
Transfer of statutory clearances Presently, upon expiry of mining lease of a particular lessee, fresh auctions are conducted and the statutory clearances issued to previous lessee are transferred to the new lessee for a period of two years. The new lessee is required to obtain fresh clearances within these two years. The Bill replaces this provision and provides that the transferred statutory clearances will be valid throughout the lease period of the new lessee. This is expected to reduce compliance burden.
Allocation of mines with expired leases The Bill provides that such mines, whose lease has expired, may be allocated to a Government company in cases where:
- the auction process for granting a new lease has not been completed
- the new lease is terminated within a year of the auction.
- Schedule VI areas, i.e., Tribal areas of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram should be excluded from purview of the Bill as the unexplored mine areas are privately held in this region and as per the Supreme Court's Judgment in All Dimasa Students Union v. State, private owners of land are also owners of minerals
- Most mines are located in Tribal infested forest areas. Thus, if a balanced view is not taken and private companies are allowed to freely operate in these areas, then both tribal communities as well as environment will be adversely affected.
- Mining sector is prone to irregularities and corruption. Thus, there is a need to create a mechanism of checks.
- The District Mineral Funds under the Act are intended to benefit such areas that are degraded due to mining activities. Since the State Governments will have better insight on the problems and requirements
of people in such region, the Fund should be managed by States. Permitting the Central Government to direct utilization of the DMF shall not be not be viable in such a scenario.
- One MP should be appointed to oversee the utilisation of the District Mineral Fund. This will ensure transparency and reasonable use of the funds.
- Privatization comes with risks of monopolization and black marketeering. Thus, the Government should design a mechanism to include safeguards.
- Provision empowering Centre to hold mine auctions in case the State fails to hold the same in a stipulated time overarches the spirit of Federalism.