38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
International

In A Qatar Victory, ICJ Rules Air Blockade as Unlawful

By Manthan Pandit      18 July, 2020 04:24 PM      0 Comments
In A Qatar Victory, ICJ Rules Air Blockade as Unlawful

Gulf blockade basics against Qatar 

The boycott of Qatar began in June 2017. With this, Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates had also introduced an embargo on Qatar on land, sea, and air. That had a significant effect on Qatar Airways, as the airline was prohibited from using nearby countries' airspace.

If in the last few years, if one has flown Qatar Airways and looked at the map for the flight, it might have been found that the routing wasn't all that clear.

Qatar limitations were considered illegal 

Qatar Airways has effectively tried to challenge the legitimacy of the blockade since it began. Although countries can cut off trade and close borders with each other, they do not have the right under the International Civil Aviation Convention to limit airspace in the way that has been done.

A provision on this explicitly states the following:

Each contracting State reserves also the right, in exceptional circumstances or during a period of emergency, or in the interest of public safety, and with immediate effect, temporarily to restrict or prohibit flying over the whole or any part of its territory, on condition that such restriction or prohibition shall be applicable without distinction of nationality to aircraft of all other States.

That seems to be fairly cut-and-dry, but Qatar couldn't get this undone even so. The countries that enforce the blockade have tried to challenge the authority of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in this matter.

Qatar has continued to exacerbate the crisis and is now being heard in the International Court of Justice of the United Nations. A decision was released today, and it is in favor of Qatar. The International Court of Justice has acknowledged that the ICAO can prohibit blockades of this kind.

At the surface, this would mean Qatar Airways will resume using Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates airspace. While the airline would not automatically be permitted to travel to these countries, it can at least use the airspace.

What remains to be seen is whether these countries will respect the rule or, so to speak, whether they will continue to drag the matter. Until now, they have not given up easily. 

The ICAO has ruled that it has the authority to prohibit airlines from blocking airspace. That means the Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates boycott against Qatar is unlawful. To Qatar Airways, this is a major win and in principle will have a positive effect on the carrier, because it will avoid unnecessarily circuitous flights, wasting time and fuel.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email