38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Bombay HC asks Centre to consider increasing allocation of Remdesivir for Maharashtra

By Athira Nair      03 May, 2021 05:15 PM      0 Comments
Bombay HC asks Centre increasing allocation Remdesivir

The Bombay HC has asked the Central Government to reconsider its allocation of Remdesivir injections to Maharashtra.

The Nagpur bench observed that reducing the supply now is irrelevant with the increase in coronavirus cases. The division bench consisted of Justice Sunil Shukre and Avinash Gharote.

The percentage of cases reduced in Maharashtra is about 1-2%, and the reduction in allocation is about 14.5%, the figures dont match and are unreasonable. Hence it needs to be reconsidered.

The bench told the additional solicitor general of India, UM Aurangabadkar, that they would pass an order soon ordering the Central Government to revise the new order and align the reduction in proportion to the decrease in cases. 

The bench referred to the Centres order dated 1st May, 2021, allocating remdesivir to states across India. As per the order issued in continuation to earlier orders, the number of vials allocated was 8,09,500 from 21st April to 9th May,2021, for the next ten days.

The order was passed to increase Maharashtras allocation to 4,35,000 vials for the next 10 days of April. The court notified the guidelines to the FDA commissioner of the State to send such a presentation, which was sent the next day after the hearing, and the increase was approved by the DGCI the day after itself.

This was a special hearing, which was conducted on Sunday (May 2, 2021). During the special hearing, the amicus curiae SP Bhandarkar submitted that the Central Government must reconsider allocation based on the percentage share of each State in the national figure of active cases.

Advocate Tushar Mandlekar appearing for an intervenor in the PIL, submitted that the latest order on Remdesivir does not reflect that.

Maharashtras Remdesivir allocation before April 21, 2021, was 2.69 lakh vials, which was increased three days later, i.e. 24th April by 1.66 lakh vials to 4.35 lakh vials for the period of April 21st to April 30th. It has been reduced to 3.74 lakh vials since then.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email