38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 15, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

CIC Denies Permission to Petitioner to Attend Penalty Hearing Against Officials Who Failed to Furnish Information

By Parul Singhal      10 November, 2020 02:51 PM      0 Comments
CIC RTI Activist ArogyaSetu

The Central Information Commission, while is hearing a complaint filed by RTI Activist and Independent journalist Saurav Das on Arogya Setu  declined him permission to attend the next hearing on the matter. 

Mr. Das wrote an email to the Central Information Commissioner Vanaja N Sarnas office about not receiving a hearing notice, the ICS office informed him that his presence is not required. 

The Commission informed him that since it is a show-cause hearing, it is only between the Commission and the CIPOs concerned. The activist strongly dissenting against the decision wrote back that it would be against the principles of natural justice if he is not allowed to make additional submissions and witness his own case. 

Das further complained that the Commission ignored his complaint about not receiving copies of the replies and submissions made by the public authorities in response to the show-cause notices, calling it incorrect on their part and a procedural lapse. 

Das in an email wrote, Denying me an opportunity to make additional submissions, receive copies of counters and additional submissions made by concerned CIPOs on my own case and denying me my right to witness my own case proceedings is against the very principles of transparency that this commission seeks to protect and upload. 

The CIC on 27 October 2020 had passed a scathing remark against the Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology and National Informatics Centre for failing to answer who had created the Arogya Setu app, calling it as extremely preposterous.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-slams-maharashtra-police-over-four-year-delay-in-framing-charges-seeks-explanation-from-sp-and-trial-court
Trending Judiciary
SC Slams Maharashtra Police Over Four-Year Delay In Framing Charges; Seeks Explanation From SP And Trial Court [Read Order]

The Supreme Court criticises Maharashtra Police for a four-year delay in framing charges and seeks explanations from the SP and Trial Court over prolonged incarceration.

14 November, 2025 10:19 AM
jharkhand-hc-dismisses-pil-seeking-mandatory-disclosure-of-criminal-cases-against-election-candidates
Trending Judiciary
Jharkhand HC Dismisses PIL Seeking Mandatory Disclosure of Criminal Cases Against Election Candidates [Read Order]

Jharkhand High Court dismisses PIL seeking mandatory disclosure of pending criminal cases against election candidates, holding no statutory duty exists.

14 November, 2025 11:19 AM

TOP STORIES

state-govt-cannot-appeal-in-cbi-prosecuted-cases-supreme-court-reaffirms-lalu-prasad-yadav-judgment
Trending Judiciary
State Govt Cannot Appeal In CBI-Prosecuted Cases: Supreme Court Reaffirms Lalu Prasad Yadav Judgment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court reaffirms Lalu Prasad Yadav ruling, holding that State Governments cannot appeal acquittals in CBI-investigated cases.

10 November, 2025 12:28 PM
managing-director-falls-within-definition-of-employer-under-minimum-wages-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Managing Director Falls Within Definition Of ‘Employer’ Under Minimum Wages Act: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that a Managing Director qualifies as an “employer” under the Minimum Wages Act, upholding liability for unpaid wages.

10 November, 2025 12:48 PM
accused-can-rebut-presumption-of-debt-us-139-ni-act-by-showing-probable-circumstances-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Accused Can Rebut Presumption Of Debt U/S 139 NI Act By Showing Probable Circumstances: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that an accused can rebut the presumption under Section 139 NI Act by proving absence of debt through probable circumstances.

10 November, 2025 01:16 PM
tenant-cannot-challenge-landlords-title-after-decades-of-paying-rent-sc
Trending Judiciary
Tenant Cannot Challenge Landlord’s Title After Decades Of Paying Rent: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that a tenant cannot dispute the landlord’s ownership after paying rent for decades, reinforcing the principle of estoppel in tenancy.

10 November, 2025 01:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email