38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 02, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

DV Act: Complaint Not Maintainable If Parties Are Living Separately: SC [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      15 October, 2019 07:07 PM      0 Comments
DV Act: Complaint Not Maintainable If Parties Are Living Separately: SC [Read Order]

The Supreme Court on October 4, 2019, in the case of Kamlesh Devi v. Jaipal & Ors., has upheld a dismissal of domestic violence complaint filed by a woman against persons not living with her in a shared household.

A Division Bench comprising of Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice M.R. Shah passed the ruling while hearing a special leave petition filed against the order passed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court whereby it had dismissed the criminal revision instituted by the petitioner under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Earlier, the Judicial Magistrate (First Class) dismissed the petitioners complaint filed under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, against her relatives. In the complaint, it was claimed that she is living with her relatives in the same premises and they are harassing and abusing her daughters.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the criminal revision observing that no evidence is in record to prove that they have been living in a shared household.

Taking note of the same, the apex court bench upheld the order passed by the High Court.

The High Court has rightly found in effect that the ingredients of domestic violence are wholly absent in this case. The petitioner and the respondents are not persons living together in a shared household. There is a vague allegation that the respondents are family members. There is not a whisper of the respondents with the petitioner. They appear to be neighbours, the bench observed.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

those-who-dont-believe-in-gurus-are-rascals-madras-hc-judge-sparks-row
Trending Judiciary
“Those Who Don’t Believe in Gurus Are Rascals”: Madras HC Judge Sparks Row

Madras HC Justice G.R. Swaminathan’s remarks on non-believers spark nationwide debate as impeachment motion and judicial conduct concerns resurface.

24 February, 2026 11:49 AM
ncert-introduces-judicial-backlog-and-corruption-in-class-8-curriculum-highlights-47-crore-pending-cases-across-courts
Trending Judiciary
NCERT Introduces Judicial Backlog and Corruption in Class 8 Curriculum, Highlights 4.7 Crore Pending Cases Across Courts

NCERT updates Class 8 textbooks to address judicial backlog and corruption, citing 4.7 crore pending cases and accountability mechanisms in India’s courts.

25 February, 2026 11:12 AM
delhi-hc-grants-jubin-nautiyal-ex-parte-injunction-against-ai-platforms-e-commerce-sites-for-personality-rights-violations
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Grants Jubin Nautiyal Ex Parte Injunction Against AI Platforms, E-Commerce Sites for Personality Rights Violations [Read Order]

Delhi HC grants ex parte injunction to Jubin Nautiyal against AI platforms and e-commerce sites over unauthorised use of his voice, image and persona.

25 February, 2026 12:48 PM
voluntary-confessions-under-customs-act-are-valid-evidence-for-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Voluntary Confessions Under Customs Act Are Valid Evidence for Conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds voluntary confessions under Section 108 of the Customs Act are valid evidence to sustain conviction in smuggling cases.

25 February, 2026 12:54 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email