The Delhi High Court on Wednesday, March 24, 2021 summoned the records of a matrimonial case from the Rohini Family Court, following the filing of a writ petition by a litigant complaining of the non-release of the certified copy of an order passed in July 2020.
A single bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh, terming the prayer of the petitioner "unusual", asked the Registrar General of the HC to call for the records of the case from the Family Court in physical or electronic form within a day. Advocate Juhi Arora, the petitioner's counsel, brought to the notice of the Court that the petitioner had filed an application for divorce by mutual consent. Additionally, on July 2020, the Family Court passed an order allowing the first motion. However, despite multiple attempts, the certified copy of the order that has been passed by the Principal Judge, has not been issued to the Petitioner.
Further, Counsel for the Petitioner is said to have been informed that the order passed on 20thJuly, 2020 was not signed by the Presiding Office, thereby resulting to the same not being released. Due to the absence of the certified copy of the first motion being received, the petitioner said that she is unable to move the second motion. Quoting, "Let the entire records of the said case be summoned by tomorrow, by a special messenger, either in an electronic or in a physical form, Learned counsel for the Respondent shall also seek instructions in this regard", the High Court said that the matter will be considered next tomorrow.
[READ ORDER]
Law Firm’s Plea for Termination of Senior Associate Dismissed by Delhi HC with Rs. 35,000 in costs
Legal Insiders
Apr 16, 2021
Tanya Sehrawat
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
30 Shares
A Law firm had filed a plea in the Delhi High Court against its Senior Associate who wanted to resign. Instead of accepting her resignation, the firm terminated her services instead. The Court dismissed the same and imposed the penalty of Rs 35,000. A single-judge Bench of Justice Navin Chawla passed the order. The order ofAdditional Senior Civil Judge was challenged by the firm, Banana IP Counsels LLP, in which its application was rejected under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil...
Nizamuddin Markaz Can be Opened for Ramadan Subject to COVID19 Protocols, Center to Delhi High Court [READ ORDER]
Judiciary
Apr 15, 2021
Shreyas Nair
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
5 Shares
The Delhi High Court was informed today by the Central Government that the mosque at Nizamuddin Markaz can be made operational for devotees to give prayers for Ramadan, which begins on (April 14, 2021), according to the Delhi Disaster Management Authority's (DDMA's) guidance for Covid-19, and that social distancing will be observed at the mosque. The central government submitted to Justice Mukta Gupta during the hearing of a petition by the Waqf Board seeking the reopening of the Nizamuddin...
Facebook Comments