38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, March 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi High Court Ordered Delhi University to Issue Online Degrees to the Students [READ ORDER]

By Lakshya Tewari      10 September, 2020 03:30 PM      0 Comments
Delhi High Court Ordered Delhi University to Issue Online Degrees to the Students [READ ORDER]

Seeing the current situations of the COVID-19 infection in the country the Delhi High Court on 7th September 2020 ordered Delhi University to issue an online degree within 7 days to the students with an urgent need of a degree. The Court further ordered that there is no need of any student to physically submit the document in order to obtain the online degree as physical submission of the document will defy the whole purpose of granting the online/digital degree. The court further added that the students requiring an urgent degree will again send the request through e-mail along with a document attached which may prove the urgency.

The Court in the order said All students who have an urgent requirement for digital degree certificates shall again forward the request they have already uploaded on the portal by marking the same under the subject header as Priority/Urgent to the email address being  digitaldegree@du.ac.in. Along with the said email, any document to establish the urgency may also be attached, such as a letter from employer, letter from any Indian or Foreign University, or any document showing a deadline. For students, the degree certificates shall be issued, within 7 working days. The Court also ordered Dr. Sanjeev Singh to create an urgency tab on the portal itself. The order read In view of the fact that uploading on the portal and sending the email would result in duplication of effort, Dr. Sanjeev Singh will consider an urgency tab on the portal itself, so that students, who have an urgency, can submit such additional documents on the portal, rather than sending a separate email to establish urgency.

After the hearing of 7th September 2020 there certain new facts also emerged in the court when the court questioned 3 officials of DU:-

  1. More than 30,000 students have applied for the degrees but none of them have been issued a degree up till now.
  2. Data of around 28,000 students have been uploaded on Digilocker but students cant access it since the date of birth is yet to be added and also it is not with DU as Du is yet to receive that data from its colleges.
  3. As far as students who graduated in 2018, 2019 are concerned there is no data available with DU, but the DU has held a meeting with colleges and for 2018 within 4 days, and for 2019 within 10 days the data will be available. DU official said that DU has decided to affix a passport size photograph of the students hence it will require a longer time.

The court also asked the DU officials to file an affidavit in order to give a proper timeline to the court for the work, the court said Before proceedings, it is deemed appropriate to the direct filing of an affidavit capturing above facts. In the said affidavit, a proper timeline shall be given to by when the digital degree certificates shall be issued for both urgent requests, separately. The affidavit shall also set out the process for students to download documents from Digilocker, in respect of those students whose data has been transmitted. Let the affidavit be filed before the next date of hearing.

This whole issue came into limelight when one Dhritiman Ray, an SRCC graduate filed a petition regarding non-issuance of online degrees to students by Delhi University, and again when on 2nd September 2020 one law student Shubham Kumar Jain informed High Court through a letter that he graduated from Shri Ram College of Commerce in 2017, he was seeking a digital degree of the course and still the degree is not been issued to him in spite completing all the formalities. He said that University insisted on the hard copy submission of the application. 

The order was passed by a single judge bench, by Justice Pratibha M. Singh.

 

[READ ORDER]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-sets-aside-ngt-order-for-temple-demolition-holds-tribunal-has-no-jurisdiction-over-encroachments-under-municipal-laws
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside NGT Order for Temple Demolition; Holds Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction Over Encroachments Under Municipal Laws [Read Order]

Supreme Court sets aside NGT order to demolish Ghaziabad temple, ruling tribunal lacks jurisdiction over encroachments under municipal laws.

18 March, 2026 10:41 AM
meghalaya-hc-quashes-ghadc-order-making-st-certificate-mandatory-for-election-nominations
Trending Judiciary
Meghalaya HC Quashes GHADC Order Making ST Certificate Mandatory for Election Nominations [Read Order]

Meghalaya HC quashes GHADC notification mandating ST certificate for poll nominations, cites lack of Governor approval and due process.

18 March, 2026 03:51 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM
sc-pulls-up-railways-over-safety-measures-seeks-detailed-affidavit-on-fund-allocation-and-travel-insurance-disparity
Trending Judiciary
SC Pulls Up Railways Over Safety Measures, Seeks Detailed Affidavit on Fund Allocation and Travel Insurance Disparity [Read Order]

Supreme Court pulls up Railways over slow safety progress, seeks detailed affidavit on fund allocation and says counter ticket passengers cannot be denied travel insurance.

13 March, 2026 02:04 PM
madras-hc-acquits-woman-in-husbands-murder-case-says-section-106-evidence-act-cannot-replace-prosecutions-burden-of-proof
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Acquits Woman in Husband’s Murder Case; Says Section 106 Evidence Act Cannot Replace Prosecution’s Burden of Proof [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court acquits woman in husband’s murder case, holding Section 106 of the Evidence Act cannot substitute the prosecution’s primary burden of proof.

13 March, 2026 02:11 PM
allahabad-hc-lists-waseem-rizvis-pil-challenging-functioning-and-composition-of-up-sunni-central-waqf-board-after-four-weeks
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Lists Waseem Rizvi’s PIL Challenging Functioning and Composition of UP Sunni Central Waqf Board After Four Weeks [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court lists Waseem Rizvi’s PIL challenging the functioning and composition of the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board; Court seeks further hearing on key contention.

14 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email