38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, November 29, 2022
Top Stories
Interviews Know The Law Book Reviews Videos
About Us Contact Us
Judiciary

Delhi High Court Asks Builders To Deposit 50 Percent Of Profiteered Amount For Not Passing Benefits Of GST To Homebuyers

By Lawstreet News Network      Mar 07, 2020      0 Comments      1,610 Views
Delhi High Court Asks Builders

Two- real estate companies have been asked by the Delhi High Court to deposit 50% of the alleged profiteered amount in separate funds and the order given by the National Anti-profiteering Agency (NAA) was stayed by the Delhi High Court till the final ruling. 

The bench stated that “The petitioner is directed to deposit 50 per cent of the principal profiteered amount. The said amount shall be deposited in two equal monthly instalments”

The court further stated that the deposits need to be kept in an interest-bearing fixed deposit receipt. The matter involves the projects of two builder companies, whose construction is based in Gurugram and Noida. The NAA had imposed a penalty of rupees five crores each on both the companies for allegedly not passing the benefits of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime to the home buyers. 

It was reported that the project started before the implementation of GST but continued even after the implementation of GST. The input tax credit calculation was used by the NAA and calculated the profiteered amount that is available in the GST system and companies’ gross turnover. 

The Counsel representing petitioner before the bench of Delhi High Court - Abhishek Rastogi stated that, “Any real estate project requires substantial investment towards the land cost at the beginning of the project and hence the ratio of the input tax credit to the total turnover may give absurd and inconsistent results and in absence of a declared methodology determining the quantum of profiteering and this issue requires a detailed analysis of all the factors which would lead to commensurate reduction of prices”. 

Abhishek Rastogi is a partner at Khaitan and Co. Notably, the NAA hasn’t prescribed any methodology to calculate the amount of profiteering and it is upto the authority to come out with a figure on a case to case basis.

 

Author: Asif Iqbal 



Tags:
Delhi High CourtGST
Share this article:


Lawstreet News Network
Editor
     



Leave a feedback about this




Related Posts
View All

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

Legal Insiders
Law college professor ends life by suicide
21 days ago

ADVERTISEMENT


Lawstreet Advertisement

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email