38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, May 25, 2024

Delhi High Court Asks Builders To Deposit 50 Percent Of Profiteered Amount For Not Passing Benefits Of GST To Homebuyers

By LawStreet News Network      07 March, 2020 10:03 PM      0 Comments
Delhi High Court Asks Builders

Two- real estate companies have been asked by the Delhi High Court to deposit 50% of the alleged profiteered amount in separate funds and the order given by the National Anti-profiteering Agency (NAA) was stayed by the Delhi High Court till the final ruling. 

The bench stated that “The petitioner is directed to deposit 50 per cent of the principal profiteered amount. The said amount shall be deposited in two equal monthly instalments”

The court further stated that the deposits need to be kept in an interest-bearing fixed deposit receipt. The matter involves the projects of two builder companies, whose construction is based in Gurugram and Noida. The NAA had imposed a penalty of rupees five crores each on both the companies for allegedly not passing the benefits of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime to the home buyers. 

It was reported that the project started before the implementation of GST but continued even after the implementation of GST. The input tax credit calculation was used by the NAA and calculated the profiteered amount that is available in the GST system and companies’ gross turnover. 

The Counsel representing petitioner before the bench of Delhi High Court - Abhishek Rastogi stated that, “Any real estate project requires substantial investment towards the land cost at the beginning of the project and hence the ratio of the input tax credit to the total turnover may give absurd and inconsistent results and in absence of a declared methodology determining the quantum of profiteering and this issue requires a detailed analysis of all the factors which would lead to commensurate reduction of prices”. 

Abhishek Rastogi is a partner at Khaitan and Co. Notably, the NAA hasn’t prescribed any methodology to calculate the amount of profiteering and it is upto the authority to come out with a figure on a case to case basis.


Author: Asif Iqbal 

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Events & Opportunity
LIVE Coverage: In-Depth Exploration of Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) at DHCBA Lecture Series [Watch Live]

LIVE Coverage: DHCBA Lecture Series explores the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 with Justice Bhambhani & Senior Advocate Jayant Mehta. Tune in at 5pm on LawStreet Journal!

24 May, 2024 11:30 AM
Trending Judiciary
BJP Moves Supreme Court Against Calcutta High Court's Ban on "Derogatory" Ads Targeting TMC

BJP moves Supreme Court against Calcutta High Court order banning "derogatory" ads targeting TMC during Lok Sabha elections, seeks urgent hearing.

24 May, 2024 12:12 PM


Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea for stay on new criminal laws

SC refuses plea to stay new criminal laws. Court deems the plea casual, noting laws aren't yet implemented. Petitioner withdraws. Laws effective from July 1, 2024.

20 May, 2024 12:58 PM
Trending Know The Law
SCBA Election Result 2024, Know the newly elected members

SCBA Election Result 2024: Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal elected President. Know the newly elected members and key office bearers leading the Supreme Court Bar Association.

20 May, 2024 03:03 PM
Trending Judiciary
Cannot Allow the Game of Hide and Seek for Committing Murder of an Unborn Child: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court denies abortion for minor rape victim, condemns misuse of legal authority to terminate pregnancy and prevent justice.

20 May, 2024 03:52 PM
Trending Judiciary
Pune Porsche Hit & Run: Bail Granted to 17 Year Old in Under 14 Hours, Asked to write essay

Bail granted to 17-year-old in Pune Porsche hit-and-run case within 14 hours. Conditions include educational tasks, supervision, and counseling. Incident killed two.

20 May, 2024 04:30 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email