38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi is not an industrial state; how will it get tankers?: Delhi High Court asks Centre on Oxygen supply

By Athira Nair      03 May, 2021 05:05 PM      0 Comments
Delhi high court Oxygen Supply

A special Sunday sitting was held in the Delhi HC in view of the recent issue of oxygen supplies to Delhi hospitals amidst the COVID surge. 

It discussed as to who has the responsibility to arrange tankers for transportation of oxygen-Centre or Delhi Government.

The Central Government had filed an application before the Delhi HC seeking a summary of the order passed, in which the Court had given warning to the Central Govt. of contempt of action if 490 MT of Oxygen was not supplied to the capital.

The Bench had passed the order after the tragedy of 8 COVID patients in batra hospital, who died due to lack of oxygen. The Bench observed that in order to prevent this, the Centre has to ensure an ongoing supply of oxygen.

The division bench consisted of Justice Vipin Sanghi and Rekha Palli. 

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Central Government argued that the liability doesnt lie with the Centre.

Senior Adv. Rahul Mehra, appearing for Delhi Government, questioned, why cant Centre arrange tankers for Delhi using its vast resources. Mehra further emphasized that despite Delhi being a non-industrial state, it managed to get some tankers by requesting industrial professionals.         He further elucidated that if the non-industrial such as Delhi can arrange for oxygen, why cant the Central Govt. do so?

Mehra states that it was never the responsibility of Delhi Government to get arrange for oxygen.

Solicitor General, urged the court to not go into the responsibility of this arrangement, as it would threaten the management of COVID in India. 

Would your Lordship want a situation where every State says it is not a State subject? Let us respond to the situation as citizens of the country, added the SG.

He urged the court to not disturb the chain of supply which is functioning very smoothly.

He further requested the bench to at least modify the contempt part as it can have a snowballing effect. The Bench made it loud and clear that contempt is the last thing on the mind of the court. 

In response to Justice Sanghis observation that Delhi is in a special position, the SG said that no other states are complaining regarding oxygen.

Because they are getting oxygen, the he Bench replied to the above stated.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email