The
Delhi High Court (DHC) on 3rd of February, 2020 sought responses of the
Election Commission (EC) and the
Centre on a plea by 11 independent candidates challenging rejection of their nominations for the upcoming Delhi Assembly polls in a previous order of the DHC.
The order was challenged by eleven people who moved the Delhi High Court on the
31st of January, 2020. The order had dismissed their pleas against the rejection of their nominations for contesting as candidates in the upcoming assembly elections, wherein the nomination forms were allegedly not accepted by the returning officer despite having arrived at the election office at the stipulated time. The appeal was filed challenging the single judge -
Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva's order of 28th January, 2020where they alleged said that the order was passed erroneously and with disregard of the facts and materials that were placed on record by them. It was further alleged in the plea that the court had declined to entertain the petition and also wrongly denied restoration, protection and enforcement of their constitutional and legal rights to contest elections from the New Delhi seat. A bench of
Chief Justice D N Patel and
Justice C Hari Shankar issued notices to the Centre and the EC seeking their stand on the candidates' plea, which also challenges
Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva's order declining to entertain their petition against rejection officer.
The division bench said it will hear the matter on February 5, 2020. Facts of the case:
- On January 28, 2020 a single judge had dismissed the plea saying it was not maintainable and that under the Representation of People Act, 1951 only an election petition was permissible and it would have to be filed after results were declared.
- The petition contended that the petitioners had arrived at the election office at Jamnagar House early in the morning on January 20, 2020 with their duly-filled forms and required documents. Since there were several candidates already waiting at the office, the returning officer (RO) issued them tokens and based on their respective token numbers the forms were to be accepted and scrutinised. However, due to paucity of time, all the people who were issued tokens could not be attended to, the plea said, adding that the returning officer asked the petitioners to come the next day. The returning officer also told them their tokens were valid for the next day and their turn would come before that of others, the petition claims.
- When the petitioners reached the election office the next day, they found that instead of tokens, the names of the applicants were being recorded on a sheet, the petition said, claiming that once Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal arrived there to file his nomination, he was directly taken inside to allegedly facilitate his filing.
- Their plea claimed that due to the "wrongful, illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and malafide actions/inactions" of returning officer the petitioners were illegally and unconstitutionally deprived of exercising their constitutional right of participating in the democratic process of government formation".
- The petitioners have sought directions to the Centre, Election Commission, Chief Electoral Officer and returning officer to initiate measures which would help them to file their nomination forms for contesting election from the New Delhi seat against Kejriwal.
Author - Dyuti Pandya
Apex Court Asks Petitioner to Serve Notice to AG in Plea seeking Use of Name, Age, Qualification and Photo of Candidates in EVM instead of Party Symbol [READ ORDER]
Judiciary
Mar 22, 2021
Aditi Aggarwal
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
5 Shares
The Supreme Court has on Friday, i.e. 19th March observed that it will consider the plea filed seeking directions to Election Commission to use name, age, qualification & photograph of contesting candidates on EVM instead of Symbol of Political parties. The Court has said that it will not issue a notice at this stage. The court has asked the petitioner to serve a copy to the Attorney General and stated that it will consider the plea.“Serve a copy on the Attorney General or Solicitor...
Calcutta High Court Disposes PIL after Election Commission Assures Conduct of Free & Fair Elections
Judiciary
Mar 03, 2021
Tanya Sehrawat
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
1 Shares
In the case, Bimal Kumar Chatterjee v. Election Commission of India & Ors. [WPA (P) 88 of 2021 with IA No: CAN 1 of 2021], the petitioner, Bimal Kumar Chatterjee filed a PIL against the Election Commission of India which mainly raised apprehensions on the conduct of free and fair elections of Vidhan Sabha in the state of West Bengal. The said PIL was dismissed by the Calcutta High Court on Monday (March 1, 2021) on being securely assured by the Commission that it would spare no efforts to...
Facebook Comments