38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, May 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Extends Limitation period under Sec. 29A & 24(4) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Sec. 12A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 [READ ORDER]

By Ayushi Wargantiwar      15 July, 2020 04:08 PM      0 Comments
SC Extends Limitation period under

On July 10th, 2020, SC has extended the limitation period for filing of cases under Sec. 29A and 23(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 taking into account the difficulty faced by lawyers and litigants by the lockdown.

Earlier under section 29A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, there was no limitation period, but time was fixed to do certain acts. Now, there is an extension of time limit for passing arbitral award under sec. 29A of the said act.

Similarly, under Sec. 23(4) of the said act provided 6 months for the completion of the statement of claim and defense and now the given time frame has been extended under the said section.

In Addition to this in section 12 of the Commercial Courts Act, a certain time was prescribed for completing the process of compulsory pre-litigation, mediation, and settlement but according to SC direction, this time frame would be extended from time to time as the lockdown gets lifted plus 45 days thereafter.

The bench also allowed the use of electronic means such as e-mail, messenger service (like WhatsApp) for service of notice. Due to the nationwide lockdown, it has become difficult to go to Post Office to post the notice, therefore the SC allowed sending of notices through messaging services, WhatsApp, telegram, Signal, etc.

The court did not extend the validity of cheque as such period is not mentioned in any statues but RBI has prescribed it under sec. 35A of Banking and Regulation Act. Therefore, the court did not interfere with the period prescribed by the RBI since the entire banking system works on the said period.

 

[READ ORDER] 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

cannot-penalise-lawyers-for-attending-court-despite-boycott-calls-tripura-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cannot Penalise Lawyers For Attending Court Despite Boycott Calls: Tripura HC [Read Order]

Tripura High Court held that Bar Associations cannot penalise advocates for appearing in court despite boycott calls by lawyers’ bodies.

18 May, 2026 03:57 PM
tcs-posh-panel-member-denied-bail-in-nashik-harassment-case
Trending Business
TCS POSH Panel Member Denied Bail in Nashik Harassment Case [Read Order]

Nashik court denied bail to a TCS POSH panel member in a workplace harassment case, citing alleged inaction on repeated complaints.

18 May, 2026 04:10 PM

TOP STORIES

punjab-and-haryana-hc-lifts-ban-on-zee5-documentary-on-lawrence-bishnoi-sets-aside-centres-advisory
Trending CelebStreet
Punjab and Haryana HC Lifts Ban on ZEE5 Documentary on Lawrence Bishnoi, Sets Aside Centre’s Advisory [Read Order]

Punjab and Haryana High Court lifts ban on ZEE5’s Lawrence Bishnoi documentary, quashes Centre’s advisory over lack of legal basis.

13 May, 2026 03:33 PM
deliberate-institutional-blindness-jharkhand-high-court-slams-illegal-mining-in-hazaribagh-issues-15-sweeping-directions
Trending Judiciary
“Deliberate Institutional Blindness”: Jharkhand High Court Slams Illegal Mining in Hazaribagh, Issues 15 Sweeping Directions [Read Order]

Jharkhand High Court issues 15 directions on illegal mining in Hazaribagh, holding continued inaction despite surveillance violates Article 21.

13 May, 2026 04:17 PM
sc-quashes-35-year-old-criminal-case-flags-crisis-of-undertrial-delay-in-uttar-pradesh
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes 35-Year-Old Criminal Case, Flags Crisis of Undertrial Delay in Uttar Pradesh [Read Order]

Supreme Court quashes a 35-year-old criminal case, calls undertrial delays a violation of Article 21, and seeks data on UP’s justice backlog.

13 May, 2026 04:28 PM
wifes-pursuit-of-professional-career-cannot-be-branded-as-matrimonial-cruelty-or-desertion-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wife’s Pursuit of Professional Career Cannot Be Branded as Matrimonial Cruelty or Desertion: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court held that a wife pursuing her career cannot be termed cruel or accused of desertion, calling such views patriarchal and regressive.

13 May, 2026 05:46 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email