Section 153A of IPC Cannot Be Invoked Merely by Provoking Sentiments of One Community Without Involving Any Other Community: Karnataka HC

Judiciary Oct 14, 2020 Parul Singhal ( Editor: Ekta Joshi ) 4 Shares

The Karnataka High Court recently held that merely provoking the sentiments of one community or group without involving any other community will not be a penal offence under Section 153 A of the Indian Penal Code.

Also Read - Karnataka HC hears PIL Challenging Cattle Slaughter Prevention Ordinance brought in by the Government of Karnataka [READ PETITION]

Section 153A of the Indian Penal Code penalizes the person whoever promotes enmity between different groups on the grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc, a criminal offence or penalizes any other act that disrupts the harmony.

The facts of the present case are that, On February 17, 2010, while the complainant was trying to cross a road, around 200-250 people who were part of a procession threatened people to not cross the road and then abused the complaint in an unwelcomed tone and language. The complainant alleged that the gathering of the procession was threatening him to not cross the road and was trying to instill fear in him on the grounds of religion. The complainant stated that the procession comprised of Muslim crowd and thus they were threatening the complainant who was of a Hindu community.

Also Read - Karnataka High Court Dismisses Pleas to Stop Non-Hindus From Working in Offices Under HRICE Act,1997

First Information Report was registered against the petitioners under Section 341, 504, 506, 153A, and 149 of IPC.

The Court after going through the submissions of the Petitioner and the Complaint held that none of the Sections mentioned in the FIR can be made out due to lack of ingredients. The nature of the threats mentioned in the complaint does not invoke Section 504 or 506 of the IPC. It was further held that the gathering of the procession did not do any such activity to frighten Hindus or to make them flee from the village. Thus the Court could not even make out the basic ingredients of Section 153A and thus it quashed the FIR and allowed the plea.

Karnataka HC hears PIL Challenging Cattle Slaughter Prevention Ordinance brought in by the Government of Karnataka [READ PETITION]

Judiciary Jan 14, 2021 Gautami Chakravarty ( Editor: Ekta Joshi ) 5 Shares

The High Court of Karnataka on 12th January, 2020 heard a petition against a recent ordinance on prevention of cattle slaughter brought by the Government of Karnataka. The petition was filed by Mohammed Arif Jameel challenging the Karnataka Prevention of Slaughter and Preservation of Cattle Ordinance, 2020. The division bench consisted of Chief Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum who issued a notice while hearing the petition. The petitioner’s Advocate Rahamathulla...

Read full post

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Pleas to Stop Non-Hindus From Working in Offices Under HRICE Act,1997

Judiciary Dec 16, 2020 Dev Kumar Patel ( Editor: Ekta Joshi ) 6 Shares

The Karnataka High Court on 14th December 2020 dismissed writ petitions which sought that non-Hindus should not be permitted to work in the office of Commissioners under the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997.A bench headed by Chief Justice Abhay S Okaremarked that "The Hindu religion was never so narrow. Hindu religion as professed never consisted of people who are so narrow minded."Highlighted points of the writ petitions as follows:Strict...

Read full post