38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

The Right to Life is the Mother of All Rights: Malawi's Supreme Court Rules Death Penalty as Unconstitutional [READ ORDER]

By Kartikey Garg      04 May, 2021 05:00 PM      0 Comments
Right to Life is the Mother of All Rights

Death penalty has been declared unconstitutional by Malawi's Supreme Court of Appeal. 

The Court stated in its decision, "The right to life is defined by the sanctity of life itself. The right to life is the most important of all. Other rights do not exist without the right to life. The death penalty not only negates but also eliminates the right to life." 

The court made this observation while granting an appeal filed by a man named Khoviwa, who had been sentenced to death. The majority judgment, authored by Justice D F Mwaungulu, notes that the Malawian Constitution does not provide for the death penalty; rather, it prohibits derogation from the right to life.

The Judgement reads, "The Constitution forbids derogation from the right to life in a direct and unequivocal manner. The essence of sections 25, 26, and other sections that prescribe the death penalty for criminal offenses are derogations from the right to life - life itself, life in all its sanctity. The death penalty is prohibited under section 45 (1) of the Constitution, Malawi's supreme law, because it is a derogation from the right to life. Surprisingly, when the legislature amended section 25 of the Penal Code in 2011, it removed corporal punishment, despite the prohibition in section 19 (2) (b) of the Constitution, and kept the death penalty, despite the fact that there could not be a derogation from the right to life under section 45 (1) and (2) (b) of the Constitution. This could only be based on the assumption that section 16 of the Constitution was 'sanctioning' the death penalty in the proviso. For a variety of reasons, some of which have already been stated, that inference is untenable."

Sections 38 (1) (for treason), 63 (1) (for piracy), 133 (for rape), 210 (for murder), 217A (2) (a) (for genocide), and 309 (1) and (2) (for housebreaking and burglary, respectively) of the Penal Code must be interpreted as meaning the maximum prison sentence - life imprisonment. 

The Court said, If life imprisonment becomes the maximum sentence where it is not mandatory, it cannot be imposed, as if it were reserved for the most heinous crimes. As a result, courts are likely to impose a lengthy prison sentence. Those who have served long periods of time or have served long sentences are more likely to receive shorter sentences or be released immediately."

 

(In Charles Khoviwa vs The Republic MSCA)
 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email