Bombay HC Surprised that Maharashtra Government Needs More Time to Make System Operational for Virtual Proceedings Under RTI Act, 2005

Judiciary Oct 01, 2020 VANDANA KOTHARI ( Editor: Ekta Joshi ) 1 Shares

A petition was filed on 15th September by an RTI Activist, former Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, and others to sought directions to the Maharashtra State Information Commission, the respondents to issue guidelines to all the public authorities in the State of Maharashtra to adopt an appropriate online video conferencing platform for conducting hearings pertaining to proceedings under the diverse statutes applicable to such public authorities as well as for conducting hearing of First Appeals under the Right to Information Act, 2005.

Also Read - Bombay High Court Allows Export of Onions in plea filed by Horticulture Produce Exporters Association

The court requested Ms.Shastri, learned Additional Government Pleader for the State to take instructions on the issue as raised in this PIL petition.

On 26th September Ms. Shastri submitted a letter dated 22nd September issued from the office of the Chief Secretary, Government of Maharashtra, and the court upon reading the letter said that

Also Read - PIL Seeking Directions to Mandate the Use of A4 Size Paper for documents filed before the Bombay High Court [READ PETITION]

“the Government of Maharashtra is inclined to adopt appropriate online video conferencing platform for conducting hearing of quasi-judicial/administrative proceedings; however, the procedure may take some time as a meeting will have to be convened with the concerned Departments including the Finance Department and that necessary guidelines and directions would be issued to all the public authorities thereafter. It also appears that some of the authorities are already conducting the hearing through video conferencing.”

The court remarked that “We are surprised that during the period of six months after lock-down was announced, the State did not consider it appropriate to provide for hearing through the virtual platform and is still praying for some more time to make the system operational.”

The court while adjourning the hearing said that “Quite reluctantly, we adjourn the hearing of this PIIL petition for three weeks, as prayed for by Ms.Shastri, expressing hope and trust that on the returnable date, she would apprise us regarding the steps taken by the Government and thereby not leave any room for the complaint to be voiced by the petitioner.”

The matter is next posted for hearing on 15th October 2020.

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Onions in plea filed by Horticulture Produce Exporters Association

Judiciary Oct 23, 2020 Lawstreet News Network ( Editor: Ekta Joshi ) 1 Shares

The Bombay High Court’s division bench comprising of Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Justice Abhay Ahuja passed an order allowing the export of onions while hearing a writ petition filed by Horticulture Produce Exporters Association and Rohan Shah (proprietor of Fair Agro Enterprises and a member of first petitioner organization).The order was passed only for those consignments for which the shipping bills were presented and generated prior to 10:28 pm on September 14th, 2020. It was on this day...

Read full post

PIL Seeking Directions to Mandate the Use of A4 Size Paper for documents filed before the Bombay High Court [READ PETITION]

Judiciary Oct 22, 2020 VANDANA KOTHARI ( Editor: Ekta Joshi ) 14 Shares

We get paper from our nature;therefore, it is our duty to protect nature. With this point of view, Sujay Joshi, a 31-year-old man filed a PIL through Advocate Ranjit Shinde, Advocate Abhay Anturkar, and Advocate Ajinkya Udane appearing on behalf of him before Bombay High Court. The PIL sought directions to the High Court registry to mandate the use of A4 size paper, printed on both sides for the purpose of presentation of all pleadings and supporting documents in High Court.Petitioner submitted...

Read full post