38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, October 14, 2024
Judiciary

"Can't Cut Thousands of Trees for Krishna": Supreme Court to UP Government

By Atharwa Gauraha      07 December, 2020 05:39 PM      0 Comments

In the name of Lord Krishna, the UP Govt can not cut down nearly 3,000 trees, the Apex Court said in an observation that should bring cheer to environmental activists around the country. 

"You can't fell thousands of trees in the name of Lord Krishna," CJI SA Bobde told the Public Works Department counsel for Uttar Pradesh Govt.

The state had sought permission to drop 2,940 trees to widen roads across a 25-km stretch leading to a temple of Lord Krishna in the district of Mathura, and said it would pay compensation of ~ 138.41 crore. 

The state also said that more trees would be planted than removed, but the court was unimpressed, pointing out that it was not the same as felling a 100-year-old tree to plant a fresh sapling.

"Living trees give oxygen & it cannot be evaluated simply on the basis of their value. The oxygen-producing capacity of the trees must be evaluated over its remaining life span," a 3-Member Bench comprising CJI SA Bobde, & Justice AS Bopanna & Justice V Ramasubramanian, said.

The Court also gave four weeks for another assessment to be carried out by the UP Govt. 

"We want an accurate report from the state", it said, while adding, "If the speed is slow, it will lower accidents & will be more safer".

The Court observed, "The only effect that is likely if the trees are retained would be roads which may not be straight & therefore capable of high-speed traffic. Such an effect may not necessarily be deleterious since high-speeds on highways are known to cause accidents".



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

plea-filed-in-sc-for-restoring-statehood-of-j-and-k
Trending Judiciary
Plea filed in SC for restoring statehood of J&K

A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking a direction to restore statehood of Jammu and Kashmir as per the assurance given before it in the case titled as 'In re Article 370 of the Constitution', in a time bound manner within a period of two months.

09 October, 2024 03:18 PM
sc-dismisses-plea-for-review-of-judgment-on-electoral-bonds-scheme
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses plea for review of judgment on Electoral Bonds Scheme [Read Order]

The Supreme Court has dismissed a petition seeking review of the February 15, 2024 Constitution bench judgment which struck down the 2018 Electoral Bonds scheme as unconstitutional.

09 October, 2024 03:41 PM
sc-rejects-review-plea-against-judgment-allowing-states-to-levy-tax-on-minerals
Trending Judiciary
SC rejects review plea against judgment allowing states to levy tax on minerals [Read Order]

The Supreme Court has rejected a review petition against its July 25 judgment which held that States have got legislative competence to levy tax on mineral-bearing lands.

09 October, 2024 03:53 PM
sc-dismisses-review-plea-against-aug-1-judgment-on-sub-classification-of-sc-sts
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses review plea against Aug 1 judgment on sub classification of SC/STs [Read Order]

The Supreme Court has dismissed a plea for review of its August 1, 2024 judgment which allowed the States to sub classify Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to provide preferential treatment to the disadvantaged groups among them in government jobs and education.

09 October, 2024 04:05 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email