A Supreme Court-appointed Committee to resolve the deadlock between protesting farmers and the government over the three contentious Farm Laws, has submitted its report to the Apex court in a sealed cover.
After deliberating over the three Farm Laws for three months, the three-member committee including President of Shetkari Sanghatana Anil Ghanwat, Agriculture Economist Pramod Kumar Joshi, and Agriculturalist Ashok Gulati submitted its report.
A Bench headed by Chief Justice of India SA Bobde had earlier stayed the implementation of the three controversial Farm Laws. Since November 2020, the farmers particularly from Punjab and Haryana have been protesting at the Dehli borders againt it.
Until further orders, the apex court had stayed the implementation of the Farmers ( Empowerment and Protection) Agreement of Price Assurance and Farm Services Act 2020, the Farmer Produce Trade and Commerce ( Promotion and Facilitation) Act and the Amendment to the Essential Commodities Act.
In the wake of concerns raised regarding the opinions by the committee members, National President of Bharatiya Kisan Union Bhupinder Sigh Mann had earlier recused himself from the Committee formed.
Collegium Recommendations Pending with the Center for Over 6 Months Will Be Decided Within 3 Months, AG Tells Supreme Court
Legal Insiders
Apr 16, 2021
Athira Nair
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
4 Shares
In line with the latest announcement by the the Attorney General, the Center will decide the collegium recommendations made by the Supreme Court within three months. They have been pending with the ministry for over 6 months.The bench that comprised of Chief Justice of India SA Bobde, Justice Kishan Kaul and Surya Kant, have recorded this submission made by the AG.“This case would be brought to a reasonable conclusion if the center tells us the timeline it will be sticking to at every...
Entries in the balance sheet of the corporate debtor sufficient acknowledgement for the purpose of Section 18 of the Limitation Act: SC [READ JUDGMENT]
Judiciary
Apr 16, 2021
Mathews Savio
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
1 Shares
The Supreme Court in its judgement in Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited v. Bishal Jaiswal & Anr. (CIVIL APPEAL NO.323 OF 2021) clarified the question of law and held that entries in the balance sheet can be taken as an acknowledgement of outstanding debt for the purpose of Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The judgement came from a bench comprising of Justice Rohinton Nariman, BR Gavai and Hrishikesh Roy.Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 extends the period of...
![Bail Granted by Lucknow High Court to Record Keeper of Civil Court revoked by SC in line with the seriousness of accusations [READ JUDGMENT]](https://lawstreet.co/secure/uploads/2021/04/lj_6151_high.jpg)
![SC Reserves Order in Bail Plea of Former Karnataka Minister and Mining Baron Gali Janardhan Reddy [READ ORDER]](https://lawstreet.co/secure/uploads/2021/04/lj_9581_sc.jpg)
Facebook Comments