38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, September 16, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Delhi Judicial Service Exam: Sluggishness On The Part Of The Delhi HC

By LawStreet News Network      13 December, 2017 04:05 AM      0 Comments

A petition filed in the Supreme Court by the DJS aspirants in September this year has revealed the severe delays in conducting the Delhi Judicial Service Examinations.

The petition is filed to challenge the entire selection process and evaluation method adopted in the Main (written) Examination of Delhi Judicial Service, 2015 on the grounds of being unreasonable and arbitrary.

It cites the result of DJSE-2014 wherein, out of 9000 students, who gave the preliminary examination, only 15 students were selected for the DJS.

The result of 2015 is even more astonishing; the preliminary examination was conducted in December wherein, 8534 students appeared. The result of the exam was declared in the month on February and 914 were selected for the Mains. The results for the Main examination were declared in July 2017, after a delay of almost one year and wherein, only 63 candidates were selected for the oral interview for the total 100 vacant posts of Judicial Officers in Delhi.

As per Rule 13 of the Delhi Judicial Services Rules, 1970 Recruitment after the initial recruitment shall be made on the basis of a competitive examination to be held by the High Court in Delhi, preferably twice a year, subject to vacancy position. But in the present scenario DJSE is held after almost every 3 years, looking into the fact that there is a substantial backlog of vacancies in the Delhi State, and following with even more backlog of cases this clearly shows the inaction on the part of the Delhi High Court creating an alarming situation of justice delayed is justice denied.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

grandchild-cannot-claim-share-in-grandparents-property-if-parents-are-alive-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Grandchild Cannot Claim Share In Grandparents Property If Parents Are Alive: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Grandchildren have no automatic right to grandparents’ property if parents are alive: Delhi HC clears misconception

15 September, 2025 10:34 AM
meeting-daughters-marriage-expenses-natural-extension-of-mans-duty-sc
Trending Judiciary
Meeting daughter's marriage expenses natural extension of man's duty: SC [Read Judgment]

SC says funding daughter’s marriage is a father’s duty; directs man to pay ₹10 lakh while upholding divorce after long separation.

15 September, 2025 11:11 AM

TOP STORIES

unfair-to-deny-flat-buyers-claim-after-publication-of-financial-creditors-list-under-ibc-sc
Trending Judiciary
Unfair to deny flat buyer's claim after publication of financial creditors list under IBC: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Unfair to deny flat buyer’s claim once listed as financial creditor under IBC; directs handover of apartment within two months.

10 September, 2025 04:45 PM
reserved-category-candidates-with-higher-marks-cant-migrate-to-general-seats-if-rules-dont-permit-sc
Trending Judiciary
Reserved category candidates with higher marks can't migrate to general seats if rules don't permit: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Reserved category candidates can’t migrate to general seats despite higher marks if recruitment rules impose restrictions.

10 September, 2025 05:11 PM
2020-delhi-riots-case-umar-khalid-moves-sc-against-delhi-hcs-rejection-of-bail
Trending Judiciary
2020 Delhi riots case: Umar Khalid moves SC against Delhi HC's rejection of bail

Umar Khalid moves SC challenging Delhi HC’s denial of bail in 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case under UAPA, citing prolonged incarceration.

10 September, 2025 05:18 PM
right-of-private-defence-sc-acquits-medical-practitioner-for-killing-assailant-by-snatching-pistol
Trending Judiciary
'Right of private defence,' SC acquits medical practitioner for killing assailant by snatching pistol [Read Order]

SC acquits doctor for killing assailant, upholding his right of private defence after snatching pistol during attack.

10 September, 2025 07:46 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email