38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 15, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Amazon Head Aparna Purohits Interim Protection extended By the Allahabad High Court until April 6th

By Namya Bose      12 March, 2021 03:07 PM      0 Comments
Amazon Head Aparna Purohits Interim Protection extended By the Allahabad High Court until April 6th

The interim protection for the arrest the Amazon Prime Videos head, Purohit, was extended by the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court this Tuesday (March 9, 2021). The FIR filed against the Amazon head, Aparna Purohit, filed for alleged depiction of Hindu gods in a disrespectful way in the web-series of Tandav, throwing bad light on the same. 

Purohits anticipatory bail plea was decided by the single bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh, granting to extend her protection till the next court date of April 6, 2021. 

The police in Lucknow was instructed to continue and complete investigation on the matter. The UP Government opposing the application submitted that the said series was wrongfully portraying God in a derogatory and disrespectful manner 

They said, the visual and wordings used by certain actors in the said web series contain certain scene portraying 'God' in a very derogatory manner for which the said F.I.R. has been lodged.

The AGG reviewed it as provocative, thus persuading the State to lodge the FIR. 

Purohit has been asked to appear in Court again on March 18. She secured her interim protection from the apex Supreme Court after refusal of the High Court over this controversy. She was asked to fully cooperate with the process of the investigation after the High Court stopped the Government from taking any action against Purohit. 

The High Court had initially commented that Hindi filmmakers have done this repeatedly and still doing this most unabashedly with the Hindu Gods and Goddesses as reason for denial of the anticipatory bail plea. 

In this matter of Aparna Purohit v. State of UP & Anr., Purohit was accused of multiple offences like section 66, 67, 153-A, 295, 469, 505(1)(b) of IPCbeing some of them. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-sets-aside-bail-to-actor-darshan-warns-jail-officials-against-vip-treatment
Trending CelebStreet
SC sets aside bail to actor Darshan; warns jail officials against VIP treatment

SC cancels bail to actor Darshan in murder case; slams VIP jail perks, warns officials to uphold rule of law and treat all accused equally.

14 August, 2025 12:30 PM
sc-refuses-stay-on-directions-for-immediate-shifting-of-stray-dogs-to-shelter-homes
Trending Judiciary
SC refuses stay on directions for immediate shifting of stray dogs to shelter homes

SC refuses to stay order directing urgent relocation of stray dogs in Delhi-NCR; asks intervenors to file affidavits amid rising dog bite concerns.

14 August, 2025 03:33 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email