38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

"Amazon Is Trying To Create Confusion By Raising FDI Policy Jurisdiction Issue," Says CCI In Anti-Competitive Probe

By LawStreet News Network      15 February, 2020 05:02 PM      0 Comments
Amazon Is Trying To Create Confusion CCI In Anti-Competitive Probe

Competition Commission India's (CCI) represented lawyer B N Harish on 13th February, 2020 called out on Amazon's 12th February 2020 arguments and said that the e-tailer has no legal ground and is just trying to create confusion by raising the foreign direct investment (FDI) policy jurisdiction issue. The case on the antitrust probe issue has been filed in the Karnataka High Court. CCI is examining whether e commerce majors Amazon and Flipkart have entered into any sort of anti competitive practices that violates the Section 3 of the Competition Act 2002 that defines the anti-competitive agreements under it. And it is also under the CCI's jurisdiction to order an investigation against the allegations of predatory pricing, exclusivity and deep discounting by the e-commerce platforms. 

In the opening arguments, Amazon pondered upon them being regulated under the FDI policy thereby alleging that the regulator's order infringed the jurisdiction of the central government. The CCI's order has been called perverse, arbitrary and untenable in law. And further to which the company said they were not given any chance to prepare themselves before having the order dated 13th January, 2020 lashed onto them all of a sudden. 

In providing counter arguments, CCI's counsel said it has been given the discretion to call for certain cases for investigation under section 26(1) of Competition Act 2002that states investigation can be ordered if a prima face case exists before it. 

Amazon and Flipkart have been targeted against the alleged constructions of statements of them offering deep discounts, preferred listings, promotions of private labels and exclusive partnerships with phone brands. 

The Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), that has been at the forefront of protests against the FDI policy violation by e-tailers, has put forth the contention a that Amazon has violated the FDI norms wholly. 

Time and again, Amazon has made a public statement that it is complying with both FDI policy and other laws and if its true then why Amazon is shying away from the investigation, said Praveen Khandelwal, Secretary-General, CAIT.

 

Author - Dyuti Pandya 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email