38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, December 20, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

"Amazon Is Trying To Create Confusion By Raising FDI Policy Jurisdiction Issue," Says CCI In Anti-Competitive Probe

By LawStreet News Network      15 February, 2020 05:02 PM      0 Comments
Amazon Is Trying To Create Confusion CCI In Anti-Competitive Probe

Competition Commission India's (CCI) represented lawyer B N Harish on 13th February, 2020 called out on Amazon's 12th February 2020 arguments and said that the e-tailer has no legal ground and is just trying to create confusion by raising the foreign direct investment (FDI) policy jurisdiction issue. The case on the antitrust probe issue has been filed in the Karnataka High Court. CCI is examining whether e commerce majors Amazon and Flipkart have entered into any sort of anti competitive practices that violates the Section 3 of the Competition Act 2002 that defines the anti-competitive agreements under it. And it is also under the CCI's jurisdiction to order an investigation against the allegations of predatory pricing, exclusivity and deep discounting by the e-commerce platforms. 

In the opening arguments, Amazon pondered upon them being regulated under the FDI policy thereby alleging that the regulator's order infringed the jurisdiction of the central government. The CCI's order has been called perverse, arbitrary and untenable in law. And further to which the company said they were not given any chance to prepare themselves before having the order dated 13th January, 2020 lashed onto them all of a sudden. 

In providing counter arguments, CCI's counsel said it has been given the discretion to call for certain cases for investigation under section 26(1) of Competition Act 2002that states investigation can be ordered if a prima face case exists before it. 

Amazon and Flipkart have been targeted against the alleged constructions of statements of them offering deep discounts, preferred listings, promotions of private labels and exclusive partnerships with phone brands. 

The Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), that has been at the forefront of protests against the FDI policy violation by e-tailers, has put forth the contention a that Amazon has violated the FDI norms wholly. 

Time and again, Amazon has made a public statement that it is complying with both FDI policy and other laws and if its true then why Amazon is shying away from the investigation, said Praveen Khandelwal, Secretary-General, CAIT.

 

Author - Dyuti Pandya 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

ranveer-singhs-dhurandhar-barred-from-release-across-gulf-states-amid-content-sensitivity-concerns
Trending CelebStreet
Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar Barred from Release Across Gulf States Amid Content Sensitivity Concerns

Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar fails to secure release approval in six GCC countries amid concerns over politically sensitive content.

14 December, 2025 12:40 AM
cash-debt-exceeding-20000-does-not-invalidate-cheque-dishonour-cases-under-section-138-of-the-ni-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Cash Debt Exceeding ₹20,000 Does Not Invalidate Cheque Dishonour Cases Under Section 138 of the NI Act: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that cash loans above ₹20,000 do not invalidate cheque dishonour cases under Section 138 of the NI Act despite I-T Act violations.

14 December, 2025 02:23 AM
sc-upholds-10-year-sentence-for-woman-in-commercial-quantity-ganja-case-rejects-pleas-based-on-sampling-irregularities
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds 10-Year Sentence for Woman in Commercial Quantity Ganja Case, Rejects Pleas Based on Sampling Irregularities [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds 10-year sentence under NDPS Act in commercial ganja case, ruling that sampling irregularities alone do not vitiate prosecution.

14 December, 2025 02:30 AM
sc-upholds-bail-in-2010-jnaneswari-express-derailment-case-issues-directions-on-speedy-trials-under-uapa
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Bail in 2010 Jnaneswari Express Derailment Case, Issues Directions on Speedy Trials Under UAPA [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds bail in the 2010 Jnaneswari Express derailment case while issuing sweeping directions to ensure speedy trials in UAPA cases.

14 December, 2025 02:39 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email