38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 01, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

"Amazon Is Trying To Create Confusion By Raising FDI Policy Jurisdiction Issue," Says CCI In Anti-Competitive Probe

By LawStreet News Network      15 February, 2020 05:02 PM      0 Comments
Amazon Is Trying To Create Confusion CCI In Anti-Competitive Probe

Competition Commission India's (CCI) represented lawyer B N Harish on 13th February, 2020 called out on Amazon's 12th February 2020 arguments and said that the e-tailer has no legal ground and is just trying to create confusion by raising the foreign direct investment (FDI) policy jurisdiction issue. The case on the antitrust probe issue has been filed in the Karnataka High Court. CCI is examining whether e commerce majors Amazon and Flipkart have entered into any sort of anti competitive practices that violates the Section 3 of the Competition Act 2002 that defines the anti-competitive agreements under it. And it is also under the CCI's jurisdiction to order an investigation against the allegations of predatory pricing, exclusivity and deep discounting by the e-commerce platforms. 

In the opening arguments, Amazon pondered upon them being regulated under the FDI policy thereby alleging that the regulator's order infringed the jurisdiction of the central government. The CCI's order has been called perverse, arbitrary and untenable in law. And further to which the company said they were not given any chance to prepare themselves before having the order dated 13th January, 2020 lashed onto them all of a sudden. 

In providing counter arguments, CCI's counsel said it has been given the discretion to call for certain cases for investigation under section 26(1) of Competition Act 2002that states investigation can be ordered if a prima face case exists before it. 

Amazon and Flipkart have been targeted against the alleged constructions of statements of them offering deep discounts, preferred listings, promotions of private labels and exclusive partnerships with phone brands. 

The Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), that has been at the forefront of protests against the FDI policy violation by e-tailers, has put forth the contention a that Amazon has violated the FDI norms wholly. 

Time and again, Amazon has made a public statement that it is complying with both FDI policy and other laws and if its true then why Amazon is shying away from the investigation, said Praveen Khandelwal, Secretary-General, CAIT.

 

Author - Dyuti Pandya 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

calcutta-hc-dismisses-pil-challenging-ecis-mass-transfer-of-officers-in-west-bengal
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Dismisses PIL Challenging ECI’s Mass Transfer of Officers in West Bengal [Read Judgment]

Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL challenging ECI’s mass transfer of officers in West Bengal, upholding its powers under Article 324.

31 March, 2026 05:49 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM
karnataka-hc-quashes-fir-against-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-in-bengaluru-land-encroachment-case
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes FIR Against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar In Bengaluru Land Encroachment Case

Karnataka HC quashes FIR against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in Bengaluru land encroachment case, holding no direct role and limiting relief to him alone.

26 March, 2026 03:00 PM
sc-dismisses-challenge-to-mha-circular-on-vande-mataram-terms-apprehensions-premature
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses Challenge to MHA Circular on ‘Vande Mataram’; Terms Apprehensions Premature

Supreme Court dismisses plea against MHA’s ‘Vande Mataram’ circular, calls concerns premature as directive is advisory with no mandatory or penal effect.

26 March, 2026 04:46 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email