38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, May 02, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Amazon requests Supreme Court to stay HC order until conclusion of Future-Reliance Deal dispute

By Shreyas Nair      12 April, 2021 12:19 PM      0 Comments
Amazon requests Supreme Court to stay HC order until conclusion of Future-Reliance Deal dispute

Amazon has moved the Supreme Court challenging the Delhi High Court's division bench order that had vacated a stay on Kishore Biyani-led Future Group proceeding with its Rs 24,713 crore asset sale to Reliance Industries.

Amazon asked for a stay of the division bench's (March 22, 2021) decision, calling it "illegal," "random," "inequitable," and "unfair" 

Future Group was issued a reprieve from a (March 18, 2021) single-judge order prohibiting it from selling properties to Reliance on (March 22, 2021), by a division bench of the High Court of Delhi. 

Amazon has now challenged the (March 22, 2021) injunction in the Supreme Court, seeking a stay until the conclusion of the earlier deal-related lawsuit. 

The Interim order & stay of the impugned Interim Common Order dated (March 22, 2021) passed by the Honourable High Court of Delhi before the questions raised herein are eventually resolved by this Honourable Court, Amazon wrote in its Supreme Court petition. Amazon's petition, a copy of which was seen by the news agency. It also asked the Superior Court to issue some further orders that it "may find fit & proper in the facts & conditions of the current case."

Amazon & Future Retail Ltd (FRL) did not respond to e-mailed queries:

The division bench made a grave mistake in passing an injunction in a non-maintainable appeal, allowing Future Group to continue to violate the EA (Emergency Arbitration) order, according to Amazon's plea. 

The single judge had delivered a well-reasoned order covering over 130 pages, according to Amazon, and the division bench had issued an emergency order in a mechanical way, halting operations for the same reasons. As a result, the petitioner (Amazon) came before this Court by filing an SLP (special leave petition), it said.

Previously, Amazon had filed a complaint with the Supreme Court after a single judge issued an interim order on February 2, 2021, halting the deal, and a division bench on February 8, 2021, stayed the order's action over a plea filed by FRL.

The Supreme Court then provided notice in response to Amazon's plea, allowing the scheme of a deal between Future and Reliance to continue before the Mumbai Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), but these bodies were not to issue any orders sanctioning the deal.

The plea is set for hearing on (April 27, 2021).

The Future-Reliance contract, which is being challenged by multinational e-commerce behemoth Amazon, has already secured CCI, SEBI, and bourse approval, and the scheme of arrangement is now pending NCLT and shareholder approval. In the Rs 24,713 crore deal announced in August last year, Future Group's retail and wholesale assets will be consolidated into one company, Future Enterprises Ltd, before being transferred to Reliance Retail Ventures Ltd (RRVL). Meanwhile, Reliance Retail has extended the deadline for the sale to close by six months, to September 30, 2021.

Since the US e-commerce company took Future Group to SIAC arbitration in October last year, claiming that the latter had breached their contract by entering into the agreement with rival Reliance, the two companies have been embroiled in a bitter legal battle. In August of 2019, Amazon made a strategic investment in Future Coupons, with the option to buy into the flagship Future Retail after three to ten years.

On (October 25, 2020), a single-judge bench led by V K Rajah passed an interim order in favour of Amazon, prohibiting Future Retail from disposing of or encumbering its properties or selling securities to obtain funding from a restricted entity.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

madras-hc-shields-ayushmann-khurrana-and-sara-ali-khan-starrer-pati-patni-aur-woh-do-from-piracy-grants-ad-interim-injunction-against-isps-and-cable-tv-operators-ahead-of-release
Trending CelebStreet
Madras HC Shields Ayushmann Khurrana and Sara Ali Khan Starrer “Pati Patni Aur Woh Do” from Piracy; Grants Ad Interim Injunction Against ISPs and Cable TV Operators Ahead of Release [Read Order]

Madras High Court grants anti-piracy injunction for Pati Patni Aur Woh Do, restraining ISPs and cable operators ahead of its May 15, 2026 release.

02 May, 2026 02:35 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-brutal-stabbing-of-woman-advocate-missing-children-hospital-refusal-under-scanner
Trending Judiciary
SC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Brutal Stabbing of Woman Advocate; Missing Children, Hospital Refusal Under Scanner

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of Delhi lawyer stabbing case, orders probe into hospital denial and directs police to trace two missing children.

27 April, 2026 04:56 PM
west-bengal-elections-calcutta-hc-expands-motorcycle-restrictions-bars-group-riding
Trending Judiciary
West Bengal Elections Calcutta HC Expands Motorcycle Restrictions, Bars Group Riding [Read Order]

Calcutta High Court bars group motorcycle riding from two days before West Bengal polling, modifying Single Judge order on CEO’s appeal.

28 April, 2026 05:10 PM
mere-absence-of-results-in-hair-treatment-cannot-prove-medical-negligence-or-deficiency-in-service-ncdrc-sets-aside-orders-against-dermatologist-plastic-surgeon-and-lifecell-international
Trending Judiciary
Mere Absence of Results in Hair Treatment Cannot Prove Medical Negligence or Deficiency in Service: NCDRC Sets Aside Orders Against Dermatologist, Plastic Surgeon, and Lifecell International [Read Order]

NCDRC rules that failure of PRP hair treatment alone does not prove negligence, sets aside compensation orders against doctors and Lifecell International.

28 April, 2026 05:51 PM
sc-upholds-translocation-of-deer-from-hauz-khas-deer-park-to-rajasthan-tiger-reserves-directs-moefcc-to-grant-statutory-status-to-cec-wildlife-translocation-guidelines
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Translocation of Deer from Hauz Khas Deer Park to Rajasthan Tiger Reserves; Directs MoEFCC to Grant Statutory Status to CEC Wildlife Translocation Guidelines [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds deer translocation from Hauz Khas to Rajasthan reserves; directs MoEFCC to grant statutory status to CEC guidelines.

28 April, 2026 05:57 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email