38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, February 21, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos Faces Defamation Suit Filed By Girlfriends Brother

By LawStreet News Network      04 February, 2020 12:02 PM      0 Comments
Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos Faces Defamation Suit Filed By Girlfriends Brother

A lawsuit was filed on Friday (January 31, 2020) in the court of Los Angeles in California State by Michael Sanchez against Jeff Bezos, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Amazon Inc. alongside security consultant, Gavin De Becker, who was allegedly hired by Bezos to work in spreading false statements about the public disclosure of Bezos affair with Lauren Sanchez. The Lawyer of Bezos said that his client would address this lawsuit in the court and the lawyer representing Miss Lauren Sanchez provided a statement from her saying, "he (Michael Sanchez) is the older brother and providing my most personal information to National Enquirer is a deep and unforgivable betrayal." The lawsuit of Sanchez acknowledges that he helped to publicize their relationship in an attempt to expose their relationship to the society but expressed a concern that Bezos and Becker campaigned to blame him for graphic nude photographs, which Sanchez denies distributing. People familiar with Sanchez have shared that he showed below the belt selfie of Bezos to the National Enquirer, without providing a copy. The lawsuit has come amid scrutiny over the source of photographs which was obtained by the Enquirer which were first published in the year 2019 in its January edition.

In the lawsuit, the brother mentioned that he used to work as the manager of Miss Sanchez and was involved in publicizing the relationship. Initially, a psychic from New Mexico suggested keeping their relationship secret which started in the year 2017.Mr. Sanchez says that reporters have been cautious to work with him on matters about his other clients since the allegations about the photographs and all of these actions, including Mr. De Beckers promulgation of the false information and Mr. Bezos refusal to contradict that false information. This alleged false info caused Mr. Sanchezs reputation to suffer damage on a national scale, as well as causing him to suffer emotional distress. Sanchez claims that due to the false complaints made by Bezos and Mr. De Becker led to, among other things causing an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in his house which led to the loss of business opportunities and estrangement from his family. However, the damage hasnt been specified in the lawsuit for defamation. 

Last Month, a forensic audit commissioned by Jeff Bezos alleged that his phone was hacked by a Whatsapp account associated with the Prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammad Bin Salman but the Saudi Government called the allegation as absurd. Nevertheless, the Federal Prosecutors in Manhattan are investigating the alleged hack of Jeff Bezos's phone. He visited India amidst the protest against the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 (CAA) and announced that Amazon would be investing 1 billion dollars to help small business owners digitize their operations. The company has been battling it out for market share with Indian E-commerce platform Flipkart, and so far, latter is winning by a small margin as Amazon has 31.2% market share in comparison with 31.9% of the latter.

The founder of Amazon did write in his blog-post that American Media is blackmailing him by threatening to release embarrassing photos and included the email by the editor of Enquirer Dylan Howard to Bezoss lawyer in which he described sexualized photos that the tabloid has obtained, as well as below the belt selfie.

 

Author: - Asif Iqbal



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

homoeopathy-practitioner-cannot-prescribe-allopathy-medicines-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Homoeopathy Practitioner Cannot Prescribe Allopathy Medicines: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Supreme Court holds homoeopathy practitioners cannot prescribe allopathy drugs; Telangana HC quashes FIR on procedural lapse under NMCA.

20 February, 2026 11:28 AM
contractual-bar-on-interest-claims-overrides-interest-act-kerala-high-court-order-set-aside-sc
Trending Judiciary
Contractual Bar on Interest Claims Overrides Interest Act; Kerala High Court Order Set Aside: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that contractual clauses barring interest claims override the Interest Act, setting aside Kerala High Court’s order on delayed payments.

20 February, 2026 11:43 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email