38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Bangalore Court Restrains Cure.Fit From Launching Gym.Fit In Suit Filed By Book Your Game [Read Interim Order]

By LawStreet News Network      26 August, 2019 02:00 PM      2 Comments
Bangalore Court Restrains Cure.Fit From Launching Gym.Fit In Suit Filed By Book Your Game [Read Interim Order]

BookYourGame (BYG), a marketplace to discover and book fitness centres, has been granted an ex-parte interim injunction restraining the Mukesh Bansal cofounded Cure.fit from launching its new product Gym.Fit.

The Bangalore City Civil Court passed an interim order on August 7, 2019, against Cure.Fit, ordering it to not launch, promote, market or sell any product or service using the Gym.Fit, CultX, and Sports.fit names, in any manner.

Started in 2016, BYG offers subscribers access to various gyms/fitness centres affiliated with the app without membership in each gym/fitness centre. The app also provides software management solutions for gyms and fitness centres.

Cure.Fit was set to launch a national gym subscription called Gym.Fit, which aggregates gyms across the city. BYG alleged in its petition that the health and fitness platform had offered to acquire it for about Rs 5 crore in June, but subsequently retracted after exchange of crucial data and intellectual property.

BYG submitted that the plan was for Cure.Fit to acquire the business of BYG and thereafter relaunch the same services offered by BYG as its own.

It was also submitted by BYG that it was asked to cease providing management services to its clients and terminate some of its employees on Cure.Fits insistence.

While this was the case, BYG contended that Cure.Fit abruptly intimated its unwillingness to carry forward the deal by an e-mail sent in July. Following BYG's response, Cure.Fit sent another allied e-mail in August. Through this correspondence, BYG argued that Cure.Fit also admitted to having possession of confidential information held by BYG. Further, it also contended that only a paltry compensation amount was offered for their termination of the deal.

Owing to the deal negotiations with Cure.Fit, BYG claimed to have lost a potential acquisition deal with Medifit Consultants Private Limited, Bangalore.

In this backdrop, BYG had approached the Court, contending that,

"The line of business created by the Plaintiff after having painstakingly built the same over four years is simply recreated by the Defendants using the knowledge, know-how, proprietary information and intellectual property of the plaintiff...

... The Defendants did not have any product similar to that of the Plaintiff and used theinformation, etc. and the skills, time, effort of the Plaintiff to hectically reproduce and copy the Plaintiffs product which is being hastily launched. The entire scheme of the Defendants to defraud the Plaintiff is apparent.

the Plaintiffs valuable body of work has fallen into the hands of the Defendants The Defendants are taking hasty steps to launch their own product tentatively named Gym.fit on the basis of the Plaintiffs body of work. The Defendants are also in possession of precise plans and methods to execute the business, and also a host of entities to approach to further their business. The Defendants have received huge sums of investment exceeding thousands of crores. The Defendants will indulge in anti-competitive unfair trade practices through abuse of dominance by engaging in predatory pricing etc. to immediately acquire the customers, clients, suppliers etc. of the Plaintiff and seek to monetise the very product of the Plaintiff. As such, it is imperative that the Defendants be restrained from launching a product similar to the Plaintiffs product."

While issuing the interim injunction order, the City Civil and Sessions Judge also issued notice to the Defendants and posted the matter for next hearing on September 11, 2019.

[Read Interim Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


John Doe
nomie zoe Nov 18, 2021

Great Article. Thanks for sharing

John Doe
Mathew bairstow Jan 05, 2021

sad to hear.!

Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email