38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, December 19, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Bangalore Court Restrains Cure.Fit From Launching Gym.Fit In Suit Filed By Book Your Game [Read Interim Order]

By LawStreet News Network      26 August, 2019 02:00 PM      2 Comments
Bangalore Court Restrains Cure.Fit From Launching Gym.Fit In Suit Filed By Book Your Game [Read Interim Order]

BookYourGame (BYG), a marketplace to discover and book fitness centres, has been granted an ex-parte interim injunction restraining the Mukesh Bansal cofounded Cure.fit from launching its new product Gym.Fit.

The Bangalore City Civil Court passed an interim order on August 7, 2019, against Cure.Fit, ordering it to not launch, promote, market or sell any product or service using the Gym.Fit, CultX, and Sports.fit names, in any manner.

Started in 2016, BYG offers subscribers access to various gyms/fitness centres affiliated with the app without membership in each gym/fitness centre. The app also provides software management solutions for gyms and fitness centres.

Cure.Fit was set to launch a national gym subscription called Gym.Fit, which aggregates gyms across the city. BYG alleged in its petition that the health and fitness platform had offered to acquire it for about Rs 5 crore in June, but subsequently retracted after exchange of crucial data and intellectual property.

BYG submitted that the plan was for Cure.Fit to acquire the business of BYG and thereafter relaunch the same services offered by BYG as its own.

It was also submitted by BYG that it was asked to cease providing management services to its clients and terminate some of its employees on Cure.Fits insistence.

While this was the case, BYG contended that Cure.Fit abruptly intimated its unwillingness to carry forward the deal by an e-mail sent in July. Following BYG's response, Cure.Fit sent another allied e-mail in August. Through this correspondence, BYG argued that Cure.Fit also admitted to having possession of confidential information held by BYG. Further, it also contended that only a paltry compensation amount was offered for their termination of the deal.

Owing to the deal negotiations with Cure.Fit, BYG claimed to have lost a potential acquisition deal with Medifit Consultants Private Limited, Bangalore.

In this backdrop, BYG had approached the Court, contending that,

"The line of business created by the Plaintiff after having painstakingly built the same over four years is simply recreated by the Defendants using the knowledge, know-how, proprietary information and intellectual property of the plaintiff...

... The Defendants did not have any product similar to that of the Plaintiff and used theinformation, etc. and the skills, time, effort of the Plaintiff to hectically reproduce and copy the Plaintiffs product which is being hastily launched. The entire scheme of the Defendants to defraud the Plaintiff is apparent.

the Plaintiffs valuable body of work has fallen into the hands of the Defendants The Defendants are taking hasty steps to launch their own product tentatively named Gym.fit on the basis of the Plaintiffs body of work. The Defendants are also in possession of precise plans and methods to execute the business, and also a host of entities to approach to further their business. The Defendants have received huge sums of investment exceeding thousands of crores. The Defendants will indulge in anti-competitive unfair trade practices through abuse of dominance by engaging in predatory pricing etc. to immediately acquire the customers, clients, suppliers etc. of the Plaintiff and seek to monetise the very product of the Plaintiff. As such, it is imperative that the Defendants be restrained from launching a product similar to the Plaintiffs product."

While issuing the interim injunction order, the City Civil and Sessions Judge also issued notice to the Defendants and posted the matter for next hearing on September 11, 2019.

[Read Interim Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


John Doe
nomie zoe Nov 18, 2021

Great Article. Thanks for sharing

John Doe
Mathew bairstow Jan 05, 2021

sad to hear.!

Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-quashes-fir-against-r-ashoka-in-land-allotment-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes FIR Against R. Ashoka in Land Allotment Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes ACB FIR against Karnataka MLA R Ashoka in land allotment case, citing lack of sanction, malice and political vendetta.

18 December, 2025 07:58 PM
delhi-hc-appoints-sole-arbitrator-in-meghalaya-hotels-irctc-dispute-reiterates-bar-on-psu-curated-arbitration-panels
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Meghalaya Hotels–IRCTC Dispute; Reiterates Bar on PSU-Curated Arbitration Panels [Read Order]

Delhi High Court appoints sole arbitrator in Meghalaya Hotels–IRCTC dispute, reiterating Supreme Court’s bar on PSU-curated arbitration panels.

18 December, 2025 08:23 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-orders-aiims-to-form-secondary-medical-board-to-evaluate-passive-euthanasia-for-man-in-vegetative-state-for-13-years
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders AIIMS to Form Secondary Medical Board to Evaluate Passive Euthanasia for Man in Vegetative State for 13 Years [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs AIIMS to form a Secondary Medical Board to assess passive euthanasia for a man in a vegetative state for 13 years.

13 December, 2025 06:00 PM
endless-compassion-not-permissible-sc-bars-claims-for-higher-post-after-compassionate-appointment
Trending Judiciary
‘Endless Compassion Not Permissible’: SC Bars Claims for Higher Post After Compassionate Appointment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that employees cannot seek higher posts after accepting compassionate appointment, calling such claims “endless compassion.”

13 December, 2025 06:54 PM
property-tax-appeal-only-tax-amount-payable-penal-interest-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Property Tax Appeal: Only Tax Amount Payable, Penal Interest Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that municipalities cannot insist on penal interest for entertaining tax appeals; only the tax amount under Section 509(11) is required.

13 December, 2025 07:09 PM
sc-expands-ambit-of-posh-act-restrictive-interpretation-would-undermine-remedial-intent
Trending Judiciary
SC Expands Ambit of POSH Act: “Restrictive Interpretation Would Undermine Remedial Intent” [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules ICC at aggrieved woman’s workplace has jurisdiction under POSH Act, rejecting restrictive interpretation and reinforcing women’s right to safety.

13 December, 2025 07:13 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email