38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, October 14, 2024
Business

CCI can probe Officers/Directors of a Company: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      19 December, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
CCI can probe Officers/Directors of a Company: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court on December 18, 2018, in the case of Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Competition Commission of India & Ors. has held that Officers or Directors of a company can be probed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI), and can also be held liable if they were the key persons who were In-charge and responsible for the anti-competitive conduct of the Company.

A Division Bench comprising of Chief Justice Rajendra Menon and Justice V.K. Rao has dismissed the plea filed by biotechnology major Monsanto for stopping the Competition Commission of India from probing its top officials' role in a case related to alleged unfair business practices in the Indian seeds market.

The Bench rejecting the appeal filed against an order of a single judge Bench which had refused to interfere with the direction of the CCI has said that the officers or directors of a company can be proceeded against, along with the entity.

However, the Bench clarified that the officers or directors would be held liable only if CCI were to come to a conclusion that they were the key persons who were in-charge of the company at the time of the alleged unfair practice or abuse of dominant position.

Further, the Bench also said that section 27 of the Competition Act, 2002, makes it clear that if CCI finds any contravention of the provisions, it "can pass orders against an 'enterprise' and a 'person' i.e. an individual, who has been proceeded against, imposing penalty."

The Company in its plea has contended that according to the provisions of the Act, penalty was to be imposed on the 'turnover' which would not apply to an individual, like officers or directors.

The Bench, however, rejected the submission and said that "Turnover, in the context of officers/directors has to be interpreted as the income of the officers/directors from the company, as there cannot be an income of an officer/director from an infringing product.

CCI in 2016 had ordered a detailed probe against US-based genetically-modified seed major Monsanto after finding prima facie evidence of violating competition norms. The regulator had proceeded against the company on the basis of complaints filed against it by the Agriculture Ministry and the National Seeds Association of India (NSAI), among others.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

plea-filed-in-sc-for-restoring-statehood-of-j-and-k
Trending Judiciary
Plea filed in SC for restoring statehood of J&K

A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking a direction to restore statehood of Jammu and Kashmir as per the assurance given before it in the case titled as 'In re Article 370 of the Constitution', in a time bound manner within a period of two months.

09 October, 2024 03:18 PM
sc-dismisses-plea-for-review-of-judgment-on-electoral-bonds-scheme
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses plea for review of judgment on Electoral Bonds Scheme [Read Order]

The Supreme Court has dismissed a petition seeking review of the February 15, 2024 Constitution bench judgment which struck down the 2018 Electoral Bonds scheme as unconstitutional.

09 October, 2024 03:41 PM
sc-rejects-review-plea-against-judgment-allowing-states-to-levy-tax-on-minerals
Trending Judiciary
SC rejects review plea against judgment allowing states to levy tax on minerals [Read Order]

The Supreme Court has rejected a review petition against its July 25 judgment which held that States have got legislative competence to levy tax on mineral-bearing lands.

09 October, 2024 03:53 PM
sc-dismisses-review-plea-against-aug-1-judgment-on-sub-classification-of-sc-sts
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses review plea against Aug 1 judgment on sub classification of SC/STs [Read Order]

The Supreme Court has dismissed a plea for review of its August 1, 2024 judgment which allowed the States to sub classify Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to provide preferential treatment to the disadvantaged groups among them in government jobs and education.

09 October, 2024 04:05 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email