38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, August 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Consumer Forum Imposes Rs 55000 Fine On Zomato For Serving Chicken Instead Of Paneer

By LawStreet News Network      08 July, 2019 12:00 AM      1 Comments
Consumer Forum Imposes Rs 55000 Fine On Zomato For Serving Chicken Instead Of Paneer

A Consumer Court in Pune has recently slapped a Rs 55,000 fine on Zomato and a hotel for delivering non-vegetarian food instead of vegetarian to a city-based lawyer who was observing a fast.

According to reports, Shanmukh Deshmukh was delivered the non-vegetarian food twice while he was fasting.

 

A Bench of the Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum in Pune while hearing the complaint directed Zomato, the online food delivery provider, along with Hotel Preet Punjabi Swad in Hinjewadi area, to pay the entire fine within 45 days.

 

Of the total fine of Rs 55,000, Zomato along with the hotel have been asked to pay Rs 50,000 for deficiency in service and the remaining amount for physical and mental harassment.

The lawyer, who works for the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court, had ordered paneer butter masala from the eatery through the Zomato app on May 31, 2019.

 

However, instead of paneer butter masala, he received butter chicken. Since the curries of both dishes look alike, he didn't realise it was a chicken dish and ate it.

 

When the lawyer confronted the Zomato delivery boy and the hotel for sending him the wrong food, the hotel agreed to replace the dish. With another receipt of paneer butter masala, Deshmukh again received butter chicken.

 

Later, he issued notices to both the companies for hurting his religious sentiments by intentionally sending non-vegetarian food to him. However, neither Zomato nor the hotel responded to them leading the lawyer to approach the Consumer Court.

 

Before the Consumer Court, Zomato submitted that the man's complaint was intended for defaming the company while it had already refunded the complainant's amount. They said that the responsibility of supplying wrong dishes is of the hotel.

 

On the other hand, the hotel admitted the mistake of sending the wrong dish twice.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


John Doe
Get Healthy Bits Nov 26, 2020

Heres our chapter of the non-vegetarian options of healthy foods to eat. Check in to see which ones you can include consuming healthy nutrition daily.

Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email