38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Consumer Forum Imposes Rs 55000 Fine On Zomato For Serving Chicken Instead Of Paneer

By LawStreet News Network      08 July, 2019 12:00 AM      1 Comments
Consumer Forum Imposes Rs 55000 Fine On Zomato For Serving Chicken Instead Of Paneer

A Consumer Court in Pune has recently slapped a Rs 55,000 fine on Zomato and a hotel for delivering non-vegetarian food instead of vegetarian to a city-based lawyer who was observing a fast.

According to reports, Shanmukh Deshmukh was delivered the non-vegetarian food twice while he was fasting.

 

A Bench of the Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum in Pune while hearing the complaint directed Zomato, the online food delivery provider, along with Hotel Preet Punjabi Swad in Hinjewadi area, to pay the entire fine within 45 days.

 

Of the total fine of Rs 55,000, Zomato along with the hotel have been asked to pay Rs 50,000 for deficiency in service and the remaining amount for physical and mental harassment.

The lawyer, who works for the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court, had ordered paneer butter masala from the eatery through the Zomato app on May 31, 2019.

 

However, instead of paneer butter masala, he received butter chicken. Since the curries of both dishes look alike, he didn't realise it was a chicken dish and ate it.

 

When the lawyer confronted the Zomato delivery boy and the hotel for sending him the wrong food, the hotel agreed to replace the dish. With another receipt of paneer butter masala, Deshmukh again received butter chicken.

 

Later, he issued notices to both the companies for hurting his religious sentiments by intentionally sending non-vegetarian food to him. However, neither Zomato nor the hotel responded to them leading the lawyer to approach the Consumer Court.

 

Before the Consumer Court, Zomato submitted that the man's complaint was intended for defaming the company while it had already refunded the complainant's amount. They said that the responsibility of supplying wrong dishes is of the hotel.

 

On the other hand, the hotel admitted the mistake of sending the wrong dish twice.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


John Doe
Get Healthy Bits Nov 26, 2020

Heres our chapter of the non-vegetarian options of healthy foods to eat. Check in to see which ones you can include consuming healthy nutrition daily.

Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email