38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 25, 2024
Breaking News
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Can Be Initiated Jointly Against Two Corporate Debtors: NCLAT [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      03 December, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Can Be Initiated Jointly Against Two Corporate Debtors: NCLAT [Read Judgment]

In a significant ruling the National Company Law Appellant Tribunal in the case of Mrs. Mamatha v. AMB Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. has held that Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, can be initiated against an unincorporated joint venture.

The question before Justice Sudhanshu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya was whether the application under Section 9 (the order actually states 'section 9' but is presumed to be an error for 'section 7') of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, is jointly maintainable against two corporate debtors or not?

Facts of the case

In this case, an appeal was filed against an NCLT order which disallowed initiating insolvency against two corporate debtors under a single application holding that there is no provision under the Code where a petition for Insolvency Resolution Process can be initiated against two corporate debtors who have collaborated for a Joint Venture.

The case pertains to the development of a commercial complex. Two companies, AMB Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd. and Earth Galleria Pvt. Ltd. entered into a collaboration agreement for developing the said complex. The former being the owner of the land and the latter being the developer. The collaboration agreement established the rights of both parties for the purposes of this project. Thereafter, a tripartite MoU was entered into between the two companies and an allottee, Mrs. Mamatha for booking a property for a sum of Rs. 3 crore.

In the said Memorandum of Understanding, the Developer and the Land Owner has been jointly referred to as the Company.

The allottee, Mrs. Mamatha filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process jointly against the two companies for failure by the builder to allot the promised property.

Observations made by NCLAT

NCLAT taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case has observed that If the two Corporate Debtors collaborate and form an independent corporate unit entity for developing the land and allotting the premises to its allottee, the application under Section 7 will be maintainable against both of them jointly and not individually against one or other.

In such case, both the Developer and the Land Owner, if they are corporate should be jointly treated to be one for the purpose of initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against them, the tribunal said.

The NCLAT, thus holding the observations made by the Adjudicating Authority to be wrong has set aside the impugned order and remit the case to the Adjudicating Authority, New Delhi Bench, for admission of the case.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

cheque-issued-for-bribe-payment-not-enforceable-under-ni-act-punjab-and-haryana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cheque issued for bribe payment not enforceable under NI Act: Punjab and Haryana HC [Read Order]

The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that bribe payments do not constitute legally enforceable liabilities under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

24 October, 2024 10:56 AM
pune-porsche-accident-bombay-hc-rejects-anticipatory-bail-over-alleged-evidence-tampering-involving-3-lakh-bribe
Trending Judiciary
Pune Porsche Accident: Bombay HC rejects anticipatory bail over alleged evidence tampering involving ₹3 lakh bribe [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rejects anticipatory bail in Pune Porsche accident case, citing serious evidence tampering and bribery allegations against the accused’s father.

24 October, 2024 11:07 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-dismisses-plea-for-direction-to-set-up-regulatory-board-to-monitor-and-manage-ott-platforms
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses plea for direction to set up regulatory board to monitor & manage OTT platforms

SC dismisses plea to set up a regulatory board for OTT platforms, stating the issue falls under policy matters, not for the court to intervene.

19 October, 2024 06:22 PM
a-judges-praise-of-politician-may-affect-publics-trust-in-judiciary-sc-judge-b-r-gavai
Trending Judiciary
A judge's praise of politician may affect public's trust in judiciary: SC judge B R Gavai

SC Judge B R Gavai cautions that judges praising politicians and resigning to contest elections may erode public trust and compromise judicial impartiality.

21 October, 2024 01:34 PM
complainant-cant-insist-on-deciding-plea-to-summon-other-accused-before-cross-examination-sc
Trending Judiciary
Complainant can't insist on deciding plea to summon other accused before cross examination: SC [Read Judgment]

SC rules complainant can’t delay cross-examination to summon others as accused; trial court has discretion on timing under Section 319 CrPC.

21 October, 2024 01:36 PM
sc-dismisses-kejriwals-plea-against-summons-in-defamation-case-on-remarks-on-pms-academic-degree
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses Kejriwal's plea against summons in defamation case on remarks on PM's academic degree

SC dismisses Kejriwal’s plea challenging summons in defamation case over remarks on PM Modi’s degree, upholding Gujarat University’s complaint.

21 October, 2024 05:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email