38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Financial Creditor Cannot Challenge Insolvency Proceedings On Ground That It Has Superior Claim Over The Claim Of Other Financial Creditors: NCLAT

By LawStreet News Network      26 August, 2019 03:15 PM      0 Comments

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on August 19, 2019, has dismissed an appeal filed by L&T Infrastructure Finance Company Ltd. while holding that a Financial Creditor cannot challenge the order of admission of Insolvency petition filed by another financial creditor merely on the ground that it has a superior claim over the claim of the other Financial Creditors.

In this case, an agreement was executed between National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and the Gwalior Bypass Project Ltd, (Corporate Debtor). As per the terms of the agreement, Gwalior Bypass was barred from creating any encumbrance, lien or from creating any rights or benefits except with prior consent in writing from NHAI.

It was the appellants case that Gwalior Bypass had approached L&T Infrastructure Finance Company Ltd. for refinancing an erstwhile loan advanced by IDFC. Certain credit facilities by way of non-convertible debentures were sanctioned by the appellant based on no objection letters issued by NHAI in favour of Gwalior Bypass. In the meantime, the ICICI Bank sanctioned certain loan facilities amounting to Rs.91.5 crore to the Corporate Debtor.

L&T Infrastructure claimed that the move by ICICI Bank to move to NCLT and initiating insolvency proceedings against Gwalior Bypass blatantly disregarded its secured lender status vis--vis Gwalior Bypass and by resorting to provisions under the I&B Code, it had acted in collusion with the Corporate Debtor.

Referring to Supreme Court judgment in the case of Innoventive Industries Limited v. ICICI Bank & Anr., the NCLAT held that L&T not being a Member/Shareholder of the Corporate Debtor Gwalior Bypass, has no right to intervene to oppose admission of the application under Section 7 preferred by the ICICI Bank against the Corporate Debtor.

The Bench concluded that After admission of the application under Section 7, if the Appellant claims that it is one of the Financial Creditor, it can file claim before the Resolution Professional, but it cannot challenge the order of admission in absence of any challenge by the Corporate Debtor, on the ground that it has first charge on the asset of the Corporate Debtor or has superior claim over the claim of the other Financial Creditors.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email