38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, March 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Former Employees File Class Action Suit against Wipro

By Sri Hari Mangalam      05 May, 2020 10:05 AM      0 Comments
Former Employees Wipro

In an unprecedented move, five former employees sued Wipro for employment discrimination while claiming that the company hires excessive numbers of South Asians, especially Indians, at its branches in the United States.

The petitioners claim that the organization racially discriminates and gives preference to Asian Americans and South Asian immigrants, in the employment stage which is transcended unilaterally across all phases of the employment- projects, promotions, transfers, etc.,

Wipro, headquartered in Bangalore, employs more than a Hundred and Sixty Thousand employees worldwide, with close to fourteen thousand in the United States. The class-action suit maintains that a huge proportion of the fourteen thousand US workforce of the company is formed of South Asians, primarily Indians. 

The suit filed at a New Jersey district court claims that less than twelve percent of the Information Technology industry of the United States is formed by employees with an Asian origin, whereas Wipros workforce is made up entirely of this race, ascribing close to eighty percent employees with Asian roots. 

The grossly disproportionate employment statistics are visual of the Wipros discriminatory hiring practices where people who are not South Asian or of Indian Origin are greatly marginalized. 

The employment practices are further reflected in the companys promotional trends as well as termination decisions. The lawsuit alleges that a disparate impact is made in favor of Asian groups while American employees are largely neglected.

All of the five claimants in the suit are United States citizens. While three of them namely- Gregory Maclean, James Gibbs, and Ronald Hemenway are of Caucasian origin, hailing from California, Tennessee, and Florida respectively; the other two-Rick Valles and Ardeshir Pezeshki, both from California, are Hispanic and Iranian. 

The suit demands a trial by jury to force Wipro to adopt a non-discriminatory and equitable method for Hiring, Promotion and Termination and other similar Human Resources related activities. The lawsuit claims that the company follows a general policy of discrimination side-lining all applicants and employees, who dont prescribe to a particular race. The main aim the claimants maintain is to force Wipro to adopt an equal staffing process. 

They further allege that Wipro so as to be able to employ as many South Asians and Indian origin personals as possible maximizes the number of visas they annually receive from the United States government. Wipro has consistently been one of the top H-1B visa recipients and secures petitions far more in number than it has employees. The suit maintains that the company applies for a maximum number of Visas in an attempt to defeat the lottery system. 

In 2015, it had received close to six thousand visas, which increased to seven thousand in the next year, totalling far more than the company really needs. The lawsuit submits particular statistics to strengthen its claims. 

Wipro has currently maintained a mute stance on the whole affair and has refused to respond to pending litigations.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-invokes-article-139a-withdraws-three-decade-old-criminal-revision-petitions-from-allahabad-hc-to-itself
Trending Judiciary
SC Invokes Article 139A, Withdraws Three Decade-Old Criminal Revision Petitions From Allahabad HC To Itself [Read Order]

Supreme Court invokes Article 139A to transfer three decade-old criminal revision petitions from Allahabad High Court to itself, citing exceptional delay and public importance.

06 March, 2026 04:18 PM
deity-may-not-vote-but-constitution-speaks-madras-hc-finds-wilful-contempt-over-delay-in-recovering-507-acres-of-temple-land
Trending Judiciary
“Deity May Not Vote, But Constitution Speaks”: Madras HC Finds Wilful Contempt Over Delay in Recovering 507 Acres of Temple Land [Read Order]

Madras High Court finds wilful contempt by officials for failing to recover 507 acres of temple land, remarking that a deity may not vote but the Constitution must protect its rights.

06 March, 2026 04:38 PM
intra-court-appeal-maintainable-against-ex-parte-ad-interim-orders-affecting-statutory-remedy-rights-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Intra-Court Appeal Maintainable Against Ex Parte Ad Interim Orders Affecting Statutory Remedy Rights: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules intra-court appeals are maintainable against ex parte ad interim orders that affect a party’s right to pursue statutory remedies.

06 March, 2026 04:59 PM
i-was-stalked-in-the-early-days-of-my-practice-justice-savitri-ratho-recalls-experience-at-iwil-national-conference
Trending Legal Insiders
“I Was Stalked in the Early Days of My Practice”: Justice Savitri Ratho Recalls Experience at IWIL National Conference

Justice Savitri Ratho recalls being stalked during her early legal career at the IWIL National Conference, highlighting challenges faced by women in the profession.

09 March, 2026 06:21 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email