38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, December 20, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

18% GST Payable On Pizza Topping As Pizza Topping Is Not Pizza: AAAR

By Vaibhav Gattani      19 March, 2022 07:34 PM      0 Comments
GST Payable On Pizza Topping Topping Is Not Pizza

The Haryana Appellate Authority of Advance Ruling (AAAR) bench consisting of Amit Kumar Aggarwal and Anil Kumar Jain held that 18% Goods and Service Tax (GST) is payable on pizza topping as pizza topping is not pizza.

The appellant is in the business of distributing various dairy and non-dairy products and is registered with the jurisdictional GST authorities. The product pizza topping, which is sold by the appellant under the brand Goodrich, is a proprietary food consisting of water, mozzarella cheese, vegetable oil, and milk solids along with premixes of emulsifiers and stabilizers. It is ideal for use on pizza as a topping of cheese as it provides a smooth, lasting taste and stringiness to the pizza.

The applicant submitted that the product Pizza Topping contained 14.5 percent mozzarella cheese and 15 percent other milk products, along with other ingredients, forming a type of cheese. Thus, it is classifiable under Chapter Heading 406 (SI. No. 13 of Schedule-II to Notification No. 1/2017 Integrated Tax/Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax and Notification No. 35/ST-2 as cheese and chargeable to GST at the rate of 12%.

The applicant has sought an advance ruling on the issue of whether the product pizza topping is classifiable under Chapter Heading 0406 [S. No. 13 of Schedule-1 of Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated June 28, 2017, attracting 5% IGST].

The Authority of Advance Ruling held that the pizza topping being manufactured by the applicant cannot be classified as process cheese under chapter heading 0406, but rather it merits classification under chapter heading 2106 of the schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, as Food Preparations not elsewhere specified or included and chargeable to 18%IGST or 9% CGST and 9% SGST.

The appellant contended that the pizza topping contains mozzarella cheese, constituting almost 15 percent of the total product. It forms the main ingredient to which other ingredients are added in small quantities. The product contains 15 percent of other milk products such as milk solids and skimmed milk powder. Thus, almost 30 percent of the product consists of cheese and other milk derivatives.

The appellant urged that the essential character of the pizza topping is provided by mozzarella cheese, without which the product will not achieve its cheesy character. Further, milk solids and skimmed milk powder, falling under Chapter 4 of HSN, also constitute essential ingredients. Even after the addition of other ingredients, the topping maintains its basic cheesy character. Accordingly, the product is a type of cheese classifiable under heading 0406, which covers cheese and curd.

The AAAR, while upholding the AARs ruling, observed that pizza topping is a product made out of mozzarella cheese, vegetable oil, and milk solids as main ingredients, with premixes of emulsifiers and stabilisers. The mozzarella cheese is blended with other ingredients and heated to the required degree. After heating, the material is transferred to a mould with the requisite capacity for packing the product into pouches containing smaller quantities (1 kg and 200 g). These pouches are sealed and packed in an outer carton. The product cannot be termed processed cheese. However, there is no doubt that, being an edible preparation for human consumption, it would merit classification under Chapter 21, i.e., Miscellaneous Edible Preparations. Once the chapter is decided, a careful examination of different entries under Chapter 21 reveals that the quest for appropriate classification rests finally at 2106 90 99, the residual entry, as the product itself does not find a specific place anywhere else in Chapter 21.

We thus conclude that the impugned product, viz., Pizza Topping, would merit classification as Food preparations not elsewhere specified or included under Chapter Heading 2106 of the schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, the AAAR added.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

fight-4-justice-awards-2025-live4freedom-and-dhcba-to-honour-landmark-legal-struggles
Trending Events & Opportunity
Fight 4 Justice Awards 2025: Live4Freedom and DHCBA to Honour Landmark Legal Struggles

Fight 4 Justice Awards 2025 on Dec 20: Justice N. Kotiswar Singh as Chief Guest; Live4Freedom and DHCBA honour landmark legal struggles.

20 December, 2025 04:30 PM

TOP STORIES

ranveer-singhs-dhurandhar-barred-from-release-across-gulf-states-amid-content-sensitivity-concerns
Trending CelebStreet
Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar Barred from Release Across Gulf States Amid Content Sensitivity Concerns

Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar fails to secure release approval in six GCC countries amid concerns over politically sensitive content.

14 December, 2025 12:40 AM
cash-debt-exceeding-20000-does-not-invalidate-cheque-dishonour-cases-under-section-138-of-the-ni-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Cash Debt Exceeding ₹20,000 Does Not Invalidate Cheque Dishonour Cases Under Section 138 of the NI Act: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that cash loans above ₹20,000 do not invalidate cheque dishonour cases under Section 138 of the NI Act despite I-T Act violations.

14 December, 2025 02:23 AM
sc-upholds-10-year-sentence-for-woman-in-commercial-quantity-ganja-case-rejects-pleas-based-on-sampling-irregularities
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds 10-Year Sentence for Woman in Commercial Quantity Ganja Case, Rejects Pleas Based on Sampling Irregularities [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds 10-year sentence under NDPS Act in commercial ganja case, ruling that sampling irregularities alone do not vitiate prosecution.

14 December, 2025 02:30 AM
sc-upholds-bail-in-2010-jnaneswari-express-derailment-case-issues-directions-on-speedy-trials-under-uapa
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Bail in 2010 Jnaneswari Express Derailment Case, Issues Directions on Speedy Trials Under UAPA [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds bail in the 2010 Jnaneswari Express derailment case while issuing sweeping directions to ensure speedy trials in UAPA cases.

14 December, 2025 02:39 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email