38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, September 09, 2024
Business

[DAY7] Lack of financial probity is not the only ground on which just and equitable winding up of company can take place : Senior Counsel Dwarkadas in Tata V Mistry Case

By Akanksha, Intern Aquilas Legal Solutio      21 December, 2020 02:46 PM      0 Comments
Janak Dwarkadas Ratan tata Cyrus Mistry

Senior Counsel Shyam Divan commenced his arguments stating that the proposal going around for pre-consultation was contrary to what is provided under the Companies Act, 2013 under which directors should act independently. 

He even traced various letters, emails and what transpired in board meeting which eventually led to Mistry's removal as executive chairperson. 

THREE SECTIONS OF COMPANIES ACT, 2013 HAVE BEEN BREACHED: DIVAN

Divan further added that the statutory provisions of Companies Act was violated.

He extensively cited, "Section 166 - on mandate that directors have to exercise independent judgement, Section 188(10) - Secretarial rules to be followed which was not in the case including giving of notice, and Section 149 - which mandates board has to manage company, not majority shareholder. "

"What happened was illegal, wrong and completely oppressive", Divan stated. 

When CJI Bobde asked if Cyrus Mistry was the Managing Director, Salve argued that there is no contract as such and it was by operation of law that he became MD. 

Once he was removed as Executive Chairperson, he ceased to be MD" , Salve added.

 

EVERY DIRECTOR WAS REQUIRED TO ACT IN GOOD FAITH AND INDEPENDENTLY BUT THEY FAILED TO DO SO: DIVAN

Divan submitted that the actions by Board of Director were against foundational principles of decency and they were burdensome and prejudicial. 

Taking reference from the celebrated judgement of Needle Industries,  Divan further submitted that Probity is much more thanmaking financial profits.

Mr. Divan concluded his argument stating, "Section 10(1) of Companies Act 2013 says articles of company will have to be subject to the act. Hence, you cannot have articles mandating pre- consultation in a board managed company.

The second half of the hearing saw Senior Counsel Janak Dwarkadas further arguing on behalf of Cyrus Mistry.

"Lack of financial probity is not the only ground on which just and equitable winding up of company can take place. It must be infraction of legal or proprietary right of a member", Dwarkadas argued. 

He submitted that NCLAT has found that the principal cause for removal of Cyrus Mistry was Cyrus Mistry's attempt to gain clarity by placing a governance structure before the board at the meeting scheduled for Oct 24, 2016.

 

IT IS NOT A QUESTION OF WHO SUFFERED LESS, WHO SUFFERED MORE : DIVAN

Dwarkadas added that the person complaining oppression must show that he has been forced to submit to a conduct which is prejudicial to him affecting his legal and proprietary rights.

He concluded by citing Article 121 B

"It is the process which enables Tata to nominate director on board. that does not mean those directors should not function independently", Dwarkadas submitted.

 

THE WHOLE CRESCENDO IS BUILT ON A LITTANY OF WRONG STATEMENTS : SALVE

Senior Counsel in his rejoinder submissions,  stated that after the removal of Mistry as Executive Chairman, Mr. Tata offered that he can continue on Board. But he walked out of the Board and wrote a nasty email.

"He did not walk out from Board, he was removed ", Sundaram argued. 

 

ONLY ONE DIRECTOR VOTED AGAINST HIS REMOVAL AS EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN, THERE WAS NO ILLEGALITY : SALVE

"The so called governance structure proposed by Mistry himself envisaged a role for Tata Trust in Tata Sons. It said that Tata Sons should have visibility of Tata Sons strategy", Salve rested his argument. 

The hearing of the case concluded. 

One week was given to the parties to file written notes.

Judgement reserved.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-seeks-report-from-madras-hcs-registrar-general-on-plea-alleging-rehearing-after-quashing-ed-case
Trending Judiciary
SC seeks report from Madras HC's registrar general on plea alleging rehearing after quashing ED case [Read Order]

SC seeks report from Madras HC's Registrar General on rehearing of ED case quashed against ex-IPS officer M S Jaffer Sait, suspending judgment.

09 September, 2024 10:52 AM
sc-grants-bail-to-former-bhushan-steel-promoter-neeraj-singal
Trending Judiciary
SC grants bail to former Bhushan Steel Promoter Neeraj Singal [Read Order]

SC grants bail to Neeraj Singal, ex-Bhushan Steel promoter, in Rs 46,000 crore money laundering case; court imposes strict conditions on his release.

09 September, 2024 11:23 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-notice-to-telangana-cm-on-remarks-against-top-court-for-bail-to-k-kavitha
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to Telangana CM on remarks against top court for bail to K Kavitha

SC issues notice to Telangana CM over remarks on bail for K Kavitha in liquor scam case, calls for restraint from leaders in high offices.

03 September, 2024 04:00 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-takes-suo-moto-action-on-sewage-contaminated-water-crisis-in-chandigarhs-ews-colonies
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC takes suo moto action on sewage contaminated water crisis in Chandigarh's EWS Colonies [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana High Court intervenes on sewage-contaminated water in Chandigarh's EWS colonies, directs urgent action to prevent potential epidemic.

03 September, 2024 04:37 PM
delhi-high-court-dismisses-plea-over-alleged-animal-cruelty-at-ambani-pre-wedding-event-warns-against-frivolous-petitions
Trending Judiciary
Delhi High Court dismisses plea over alleged Animal Cruelty at Ambani Pre-Wedding Event, warns against frivolous petitions [Read Order]

Delhi High Court dismisses plea alleging animal cruelty at Ambani pre-wedding event, emphasizes the need for credible evidence, and warns against frivolous petitions.

03 September, 2024 06:14 PM
sc-directs-manipur-hc-to-appoint-sole-dalit-candidate-as-district-judge
Trending Judiciary
SC directs Manipur HC to appoint sole Dalit candidate as District Judge [Read Judgment]

SC directs Manipur HC to appoint Dalit candidate as District Judge, ruling executive orders can't override statutory rules, ensuring fairness under Article 14.

03 September, 2024 06:32 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email