38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

JetLite Employees Move NCLT With Plea Seeking Inclusion In Resolution Proceedings Of Jet Airways

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      18 February, 2020 11:02 AM      0 Comments
JetLite Employees Move NCLT With Plea Seeking Inclusion In Resolution Proceedings Of Jet Airways

On Saturday (February 15, 2020) employees of JetLite, wholly owned subsidiary of defunct Jet Airways, moved the Mumbai bench of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) with a plea asking for inclusion of JetLite employees in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Jet Airways. The court scheduled to hear plea on 3rd week of March.

Advocate of JetLite employees told that Resolution Professional (RP) has rejected their claims.

Claims submitted to the Jet Airways RP are being rejected and JetLites employees are being neglected, argued the counsel for the employees of JetLite. Jet Airways and JetLite are interdependent entities. The dues of JetLite employees are around Rs 50 crore.

The Final date of submission of expression of interest was January 15, 2020 and the last date of submission of resolution plan is February 17, 2020.

Consortium of banks led by State Bank of India moved to NCLT with a request to initiated Insolvency Resolution Process (IRP) against defunct airline. As a result of which on April 17, 2019 operations of defunct Jet Airways were shuttered, to start corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP).

Anil Shukla, a pilot with JetLite, said there were around 600 employees with the airline.

What is IRP, CIRP and RP?

The Insolvency Resolution Process (IRP) is a one under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, where the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) initiates a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) when a company defaults on making payment to creditors. A financial creditor, operational creditor or corporate itself can file an application before NCLT for initiating IRP when default has occurred. In case of housing project, after amendment in the code, a homebuyer can also approach NCLT for initiating IRP if a developer fails to provide possession of the house or refund the money.

Under IRP, an interim Resolution Professional (RP) is appointed with the power to take charge of the company which has defaulted. The professionals task is to take necessary steps to revive the company. Appointed professional also has the power to raise fresh funds to continue operations.

The IRP is granted 180 days to find a resolution, which can be extended by 90 days. If the IRP fails to find a resolution by then, the company is liquidated to pay the creditors.

 

Author Satwik Sharma



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email