38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Kotak Bank Moves Bombay HC Against RBI Over Promoter Shareholding Dispute

By LawStreet News Network      11 December, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Kotak Bank Moves Bombay HC Against RBI Over Promoter Shareholding Dispute

Kotak Mahindra Bank has moved the Bombay High Court after the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) rejected its bid to issue preference shares for reducing promoter stake.

The bank has to bring down promoter stake to 20% from 30% by December and to 15% by March 2020. The banks MD & CEO, who is also the promoter of the bank, has 30% stake.

Earlier, in August the bank issued perpetual non-convertible preference shares (PNCPS) to reduce the promoter stake to 19.7%.

However, RBI tuned down the plea to reduce promoter stake by issuing PNCPS, holding that it did not meet the promoter holding dilution requirement.

The private sector lender said the bank had clarified and conveyed to the RBI its position in relation to PNCPS being a part of the paid-up capital and the legal basis on the matter of dilution of shareholding under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

We have also shared with the RBI the opinions of eminent jurists and senior most legal counsels of the country, which confirm our understanding, the bank said in a filing with the exchanges.

However, we have not heard from the RBI on the above matter. Given the milestone of December 31, 2018, the bank has been left with no option but to protect its interest. By way of abundant caution, the bank has filed a writ petition with the Bombay High Court to validate the banks position, the bank added.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-offence-under-sc-st-act-if-alleged-casteist-abuse-occurred-inside-private-house-sc
Trending Judiciary
No Offence Under SC/ST Act If Alleged Casteist Abuse Occurred Inside Private House: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules SC/ST Act offence is not made out if alleged casteist abuse occurred inside a private house without public view.

14 May, 2026 03:16 PM
madras-hc-bars-tiruppattur-mla-from-floor-test-over-disputed-one-vote-victory
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bars Tiruppattur MLA From Floor Test Over Disputed One-Vote Victory [Read Order]

Madras High Court restrains Tiruppattur MLA from floor test participation over disputed one-vote victory and alleged electoral irregularities.

14 May, 2026 03:24 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-refers-to-larger-bench-issue-on-stage-of-hearing-accused-under-section-223-bnss-before-cognizance
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Refers to Larger Bench Issue on Stage of Hearing Accused Under Section 223 BNSS Before Cognizance [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court refers to Larger Bench issue on when accused must be heard under Section 223 BNSS before taking cognizance.

09 May, 2026 10:25 AM
hymen-intact-does-not-mean-no-penetration-delhi-high-court-upholds-pocso-conviction-of-tenant-who-raped-six-year-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
‘Hymen Intact Does Not Mean No Penetration’: Delhi High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction of Tenant Who Raped Six-Year-Old Girl [Read Order]

Delhi High Court upheld a tenant’s POCSO conviction for raping a six-year-old girl, holding that an intact hymen does not negate penetration.

09 May, 2026 12:42 PM
consumer-commission-directs-bus-operator-to-pay-50000-compensation-after-barat-reaches-wedding-destination-at-3-am-due-to-breakdown
Trending Judiciary
Consumer Commission Directs Bus Operator to Pay ₹50,000 Compensation After Barat Reaches Wedding Destination at 3 AM Due to Breakdown [Read Order]

Delhi Consumer Commission ordered a bus operator to pay ₹50,000 compensation after a Barat reached the wedding venue at 3 AM due to breakdown.

09 May, 2026 01:56 PM
sabarimala-reference-day-13-can-faith-justify-civil-death-and-genital-cutting-of-children-sc-bench-examines-religions-reach-over-the-body
Trending Judiciary
Sabarimala Reference Day 13: “Can Faith Justify Civil Death and Genital Cutting of Children?”: SC Bench Examines Religion’s Reach Over the Body

SC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.

09 May, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email