38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, April 29, 2024
Business

LIC Plea To Acquire Stake In IDBI Rejected By Delhi HC

By LawStreet News Network      17 December, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
LIC Plea To Acquire Stake In IDBI Rejected By Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court on December 17, 2018, rejected a plea challenging the Life Insurance Corporation’s (LIC) move to acquire 51% stake in Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI).

Justice Vibhu Bakhru was hearing a petition filed by the All India IDBI Officers’ Association, which had opposed the move of LIC on the grounds that change in shareholding could take away the public sector bank status of IDBI and that the move will adversely affect the employment conditions of the employees of the IDBI Bank especially the SC/ST and the OBC employees.

Earlier, LIC had told the Delhi High Court that it wanted to acquire 51% stake in the IDBI as the State run insurance company has been toying with the idea of having banking operations since 2000.

LIC said it had in the past made several attempts to have a bank of its own, but its endeavours had “failed” as “nothing fructified.”

Senior advocate Sandeep Sethi, representing the bank, said that consent of employees was not required while changing the status of the company by government’s disinvestment.

The association, represented by advocate Prashant Bhushan, had claimed that the reduction of 51% stake by the Government of India in IDBI Bank Ltd and acquisition of 51% stake by LIC was against the Industrial Development Bank of India Act, 1964, and the Industrial Development Bank (Transfer of Undertaking and Repeal) Act, 2003, when read in conjunction.

“The said acquisition will result in the loss of the status of IDBI as a “public sector bank” and a “government company,” which is in violation of the parliamentary assurances,” advocate Bhushan argued.

Further, Bhushan also argued that “the acquisition was not a financially prudent decision for LIC given the fact that IDBI Bank Ltd. has gross NPA’s amounting to a whopping ₹55,588.26 crore.”



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

telangana-hc-rules-in-favour-of-marriott-hotel-in-property-dispute-with-waqf-board
Trending Judiciary
Telangana HC rules in favour of Marriott Hotel in Property Dispute with waqf Board

Telangana High Court favors Marriott Hotel, rejecting Telangana State Waqf Board's property claims.

29 April, 2024 11:31 AM
supreme-courts-judgment-on-evms-tight-slap-on-those-creating-misinformation
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court's judgment on EVMs --tight slap on those creating misinformation

Supreme Court of India reaffirms reliability of EVMs, dismissing misinformation and confirming accuracy in elections.

29 April, 2024 12:03 PM

TOP STORIES

denying-child-care-leave-to-working-mothers-of-disabled-children-violated-constitutional-mandate-sc
Trending Judiciary
Denying child care leave to working mothers of disabled children violated constitutional mandate: SC

Supreme Court of India rules denying child care leave for mothers of disabled kids violates constitutional rights.

23 April, 2024 11:15 AM
ignorance-is-not-bliss-okhla-waste-to-energy-plant-needs-to-be-relocated-residents-argue
Trending Environment
Ignorance is not bliss: Okhla Waste to Energy Plant needs to be relocated, residents argue

Questions on the suitability of waste-to-energy plants in Delhi are not new, but the 2,000 tonnes per day Waste to Energy (WTE) plant, situated in the middle of the dense residential areas around Sukhdev Vihar, is not just a major environmental worry but an example of how siting rules can be bent to accommodate a heavily polluting enterprise.

23 April, 2024 12:29 PM
promotional-trailers-of-movie-not-a-promise-or-offer-sc
Trending CelebStreet
Promotional trailers of movie not a promise or offer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules movie trailers aren't promises or offers, not enforceable by law.

23 April, 2024 03:01 PM
baba-ramdev-contempt-case-sc-to-consider-role-of-fmcgs-in-misleading-ads
Trending Judiciary
Baba Ramdev contempt case: SC to consider role of FMCGs in misleading ads

SC expands contempt case to include FMCGs for misleading ads, grills IMA, asks for government affidavits.

23 April, 2024 03:16 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email