38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

LOreal Owes California Startup $91 Million For Stealing Its Trade Secrets

By LawStreet News Network      14 August, 2019 02:04 PM      0 Comments
LOreal Owes California Startup $91 Million For Stealing Its Trade Secrets

LOreal SA is to pay a California-based startup $91.4 million for stealing its trade secrets, breaching a contract and infringing two patents related to a popular system that protects hair during bleaching treatments, a federal jury decided on August 12, 2019, in the case of Liqwd Inc. v. LOreal USA Inc.

The jury, in Wilmington, Delaware, also found that LOreals acts were intentional, meaning the judge can substantially increase the damages if he chooses.

Olaplex LLC had accused the French giant of stealing the secrets in a meeting in California in 2015, when the companies were in talks for LOreal to buy the startup. LOreal, during a weeklong trial, said it independently conceived the use of a critical acid in August 2014 and developed its products on its own.

US District Judge Joseph Bataillon ruled in late June that LOreals products had infringed the two patents at issue. One question the jury had to decide was whether the patents were valid to begin with. Another was whether LOreal had stolen the trade secrets. A third was whether it had broken nondisclosure agreements relating to them. The answer to all three was yes.

The startup has no physical store and does little traditional advertising. Yet its core products, launched on the companys website in June 2014 after a trial by top hair quickly built a following. It says they strengthen and reconnect protein bonds during bleaching.

LOreal, whose hair-dyeing innovations go back more than a century, reported more than $30 billion in sales for last year. The product lines in question, which all involve the three-step hair-protection system, are just one part of a division with about $3.7 billion in sales, or 12% of LOreals 2018 revenue, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. But they are sold under the prestigious Matrix, Redken and LOreal Professionnel labels, important to the overall brands identity.

By November 2014, one of the largest wholesale salon and beauty-supply distributors in the country, SalonCentric, had put Olaplex on U.S. shelves, propelling it to an early success. SalonCentric is owned by LOreal, which noticed the products performance and buzz on social media and tried to hire away the two scientists who invented the product, according to Olaplexs lawsuit.

Outsiders to the industry, the pair had worked out of the requisite California-startup garage, pouring their product from five-gallon buckets into small bottles, and decided to stay put.

(Source Livemint)

 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email