38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Rs. 100 crore defamation suit filed against Manu Rishi Guptha for blog post by ITC

By Saakshi S. Rawat      15 July, 2021 02:43 PM      0 Comments
Rs. 100 crore defamation suit filed against Manu Rishi Guptha for blog post by ITC

The ITC has taken a defamation action worth Rs 100 crore toward portfolio manager and blogger Manu Rishi Guptha, as well as two senior executives of the financial blog site FinMedium. Guptha, CEO of SEBI-registered investment advisory firm MRG Capital Partners, they had published a blog post titled Magic, illusion, or just trickery - The saga of ITC, in which he criticised the Kolkata-based companys business decisions and accused the management and board of directors of discrepancies.

The article, which was first uploaded on Guptha's personal blog, and was eventually picked up by FinMedium, a blog that collects information from the countrys financial bloggers. Dhruv Girdhar, the founder and Editor-in-Chief of FinMedium, and Ghanist Nagpal, the Managing Editor, have been listed as co-defendants in the complaint by ITC.

In its plea to the Calcutta High Court, ITC claimed that Guptha's post, implied among several other factors, that the company's board of directors and management engaged in insider trading on a regular basis, that the company had misguided shareholders, that the board had made irrational business strategies, and that the company had falsified its books of accounts.

As per ITC, the corporation and its management have endured significant hardship, agony, and embarrassment as a result of the post. The firm went on to say that the blog post's assertions were inaccurate, deceptive, and in some instances, facts were combined with innuendos and viewpoint in an attempt to exaggerate the situation.

Guptha had previously published a similar blog post headlined 10 blunders - 1 arrogant company - millions of shareholders suffering, according to the petition, but the company had dismissed it as a single erroneous incident.

The claims made by Guptha in the blog, according to ITC, were intended to harm the company's name and management's reliability.

As a substitute, ITC has requested that the court undertake an investigation into the company's losses and damages as a result of the posting, and determine a figure payable by Guptha, Girdhar, and Nagpal.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email