38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

NCLT asks DHFL creditors to consider ex-promoters offer

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      24 May, 2021 12:59 PM      0 Comments
NCLT asks DHFL creditors to consider ex-promoters offer

In a new turn of events, the Mumbai bench of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) asked the committee of the creditors to consider the offer made by Companys Chairman and Managing Director, Kapil Wadhawan and apprise the Court with the next ten days.

Wadhawan, in a letter to DHFL Administrator and CoC, claimed that his proposal in December,2020, provides for full repayment of the principal to all creditors. The settlement plan submitted by Wadhawan, promised an upfront payment of 9,000 crore in cash, out of the free cash on the books of DHFL and 31,000 crore to be paid within seven years in equal annual instalments with 8.5 per cent interest to the financial creditors. The repayments would be funded through a change in DHFLs operations and creating more retail assets on the loan book. 

In an earlier plan, Wadhawan had proposed to repay lenders by selling assets.The lenders had rejected the offer citing lack of credibility and valuation attached to the proposed asset sale and voted in January, 2021, to selling DHFL to Piramal Group under the bankruptcy process, after Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Ltd, a subsidiary of the Piramal Enterprises Limited, had won the bid for acquiring DHFL. The resolution had received approvals from Reserve Bank of India in February 2021 and Competition Commission of India in April 2021.

Diwan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd, DHFL, is a deposit-taking housing finance company. In 2019, Cobrapost, an Indian investigative journalist group published an expose of DHFL for various shell corporations to siphon more that 31,000 crores of public money for personal gains of the DHLFs primary stakeholder, Kapil Wadhawan. DHFL owed over 90,000 crores to banks and other investors when it went bankrupt. The promoter family, including Wadhawan, are being investigated for corruption and siphoning off funds.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email