38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, August 13, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Tussle Between OYO and ZO Rooms; Restructuring Move by OYO Challenged by Zo Rooms; Petition filed in Delhi High Court

By LawStreet News Network      29 January, 2020 11:01 AM      0 Comments
Tussle Between OYO and ZO Rooms; Restructuring Move by OYO Challenged by Zo Rooms; Petition filed in Delhi High Court

The fight between ZO Rooms and OYO has taken a quick turn with a fresh plea filed in the Delhi High Court on January 21, 2020 against the restructuring step taken by Zo Rooms SoftBank backed accommodation major.

Zo Rooms moved the Delhi High Court against the decision of OYO to restructure business and place them under new entities without consulting either the Arbitrator or Zo Rooms.

Further, the petition contends that this demerger will negatively affect the claim as sought by Zo with 7% stakes in OYO parent Oravel Stays

The story began with the merger of Zo and Oravel Stays in 2015. M Ahmadi former Chief Justice of India is the arbitrator for the matter, following the sole directive of Supreme Court in October, 2018.

Zo has now made two new entities- Oyo Hotel and Homes, and Oravel Stays Singapore, a party to the arbitration. The Delhi High Court in its order dated 24 January, 2020 has asked Oyo to file a reply in 2 weeks time, this also implies that the 2 new entities shall be bound by the arbitral award, based on the final outcome of arbitration.

The real dispute was between Zo Rooms and Oravel Stays but the recent transfer of business by Oravel Stays to Oyo hotels and homes and Oravel stays Singapore will result in Zo losing out on the value of revenue as it has been shifted to others.

If we draw a raw calculation of valuing the Oravel Stay at $5 billion, a 7% stake would be valued around $350 million and at lower valuation it will decrease at much lower rate. However, the Delhi High Court has dismissed the petition and asked the arbitrator to fix a date, meet with the concerned parties and resolve the issue. 

In an e-mail, Oyo responded that it cannot comment specifically on the matter due to the prohibition imposed by judicial forums. 

Important to note that this restructuring doesnt have any adverse impact on the companys value. The entire demerger process occurred and necessary filings were completed across different stages since March 2019 and even communicated publicly through newspaper advertisements in June 2019 and September 2019, an Oyo spokesperson added. 

Zos legal counsel denied to respond on the matter.

The new entities that Oyo created and the division of assets, including alienation of the brand to Oyo Singapore, means they could technically be said to be outside the ambit of an award in the Zostel-Oyo arbitration. The result of the Delhi high court order is that these entities have also submitted to the arbitration process and are bound by an arbitral award, said Vivek Durai, co-founder of Paper.vc, a business intelligence platform.

A leading daily newspaper reported last year that Oyos parent company Oravel Stays is transferring the India Hotel Business, which also includes new arenas like co-working and event management to its subsidiary Alcott Town Planners according to regulatory filings made by the company.

Author: Aarya Mishra



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

TOP STORIES

in-house-procedure-had-legal-sanctity-sc-dismisses-justice-varmas-plea-against-recommendation-for-removal
Trending Judiciary
'In-house procedure had legal sanctity,' SC dismisses Justice Varma's plea against recommendation for removal

SC upholds in-house probe into Justice Varma, dismisses his plea against removal; says process is legally valid and judge’s conduct lacked credibility.

07 August, 2025 12:05 PM
sole-testimony-of-victim-even-without-medical-evidence-sufficient-to-uphold-rape-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Sole testimony of victim even without medical evidence sufficient to uphold rape conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Victim’s sole testimony, even without medical evidence, sufficient to uphold rape conviction if found credible and consistent.

07 August, 2025 03:11 PM
sc-recalls-order-against-hc-judge-on-taking-away-criminal-roster
Trending Judiciary
SC recalls order against HC judge on taking away criminal roster

SC recalls order removing HC judge from criminal roster, cites institutional dignity; says directions weren’t to embarrass but to uphold judicial integrity.

08 August, 2025 12:43 PM
sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email