38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Tussle Between OYO and ZO Rooms; Restructuring Move by OYO Challenged by Zo Rooms; Petition filed in Delhi High Court

By LawStreet News Network      29 January, 2020 11:01 AM      0 Comments
Tussle Between OYO and ZO Rooms; Restructuring Move by OYO Challenged by Zo Rooms; Petition filed in Delhi High Court

The fight between ZO Rooms and OYO has taken a quick turn with a fresh plea filed in the Delhi High Court on January 21, 2020 against the restructuring step taken by Zo Rooms SoftBank backed accommodation major.

Zo Rooms moved the Delhi High Court against the decision of OYO to restructure business and place them under new entities without consulting either the Arbitrator or Zo Rooms.

Further, the petition contends that this demerger will negatively affect the claim as sought by Zo with 7% stakes in OYO parent Oravel Stays

The story began with the merger of Zo and Oravel Stays in 2015. M Ahmadi former Chief Justice of India is the arbitrator for the matter, following the sole directive of Supreme Court in October, 2018.

Zo has now made two new entities- Oyo Hotel and Homes, and Oravel Stays Singapore, a party to the arbitration. The Delhi High Court in its order dated 24 January, 2020 has asked Oyo to file a reply in 2 weeks time, this also implies that the 2 new entities shall be bound by the arbitral award, based on the final outcome of arbitration.

The real dispute was between Zo Rooms and Oravel Stays but the recent transfer of business by Oravel Stays to Oyo hotels and homes and Oravel stays Singapore will result in Zo losing out on the value of revenue as it has been shifted to others.

If we draw a raw calculation of valuing the Oravel Stay at $5 billion, a 7% stake would be valued around $350 million and at lower valuation it will decrease at much lower rate. However, the Delhi High Court has dismissed the petition and asked the arbitrator to fix a date, meet with the concerned parties and resolve the issue. 

In an e-mail, Oyo responded that it cannot comment specifically on the matter due to the prohibition imposed by judicial forums. 

Important to note that this restructuring doesnt have any adverse impact on the companys value. The entire demerger process occurred and necessary filings were completed across different stages since March 2019 and even communicated publicly through newspaper advertisements in June 2019 and September 2019, an Oyo spokesperson added. 

Zos legal counsel denied to respond on the matter.

The new entities that Oyo created and the division of assets, including alienation of the brand to Oyo Singapore, means they could technically be said to be outside the ambit of an award in the Zostel-Oyo arbitration. The result of the Delhi high court order is that these entities have also submitted to the arbitration process and are bound by an arbitral award, said Vivek Durai, co-founder of Paper.vc, a business intelligence platform.

A leading daily newspaper reported last year that Oyos parent company Oravel Stays is transferring the India Hotel Business, which also includes new arenas like co-working and event management to its subsidiary Alcott Town Planners according to regulatory filings made by the company.

Author: Aarya Mishra



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email