38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Patent agreement between Sisvel and Mitsubishi, and Xiaomi ends long-running Dispute

By Saakshi S. Rawat      21 August, 2021 01:29 PM      0 Comments
Patent agreement between Sisvel and Mitsubishi, and Xiaomi ends long-running Dispute

The continuing SEP ( Standard Essential Patents) argument amongst Sisvel and Mitsubishi, and Xiaomi, has finally come to an end. Within conclusion, Sisvel and Mitsubishi reached an agreement with Xiaomi to resolve all of their UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunication Systems) and LTE ( Long Term Evolution) patent cases worldwide. 

Mitsubishi Electric, Sisvel's licensor, and the NPE had challenged Xiaomi throughout Europe. Xiaomi, on the other side, had filed a lawsuit against Sisvel in China's Beijing Intellectual Property Court, requesting a decision of SEP royalty rates.

Xiaomi agreed to a licence with all its patents related to mobile connectivity in the most recent agreement between the two competitors. In conjunction, the businesses stated in a joint press statement that they will drop all of their cases in China, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. 

Approximately 120 patent families constitute Sisvel and Mitsubishi Electric's mobile patent portfolio. Xiaomi has officially been granted a licence to use this patent portfolio.

Through the digital cellular programme, we have merged and licenced different telecommunications licencing programmes for the UMTS and LTE specifications since early 2018, Sisvel explained. Patents from Sisvel and Mitsubishi are included in the portfolio, which totals 82 patent families for the 3G standard. It also includes 107 patents for LTE standard.

The firm expects a licencing cost of 0.35 per device for 3G, Sisvel said. For LTE, however, this cost climbs to 0.53. Licensees should spend a total of 0.88 for both licences. The deal only covers Sisvel and Mitsubishi patents since Xiaomi has not joined the MCP programme. Other MCP licensors' patents are not covered by the memorandum of understanding.

Sisvel has maintained for years that it had been attempting to convince Xiaomi to sign a licencing deal covering its full UMTS and LTE portfolio. Sisvel is also taking legal action against additional companies in the UK, the Netherlands, and Italy, including Oppo and OnePlus.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email