38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Prashant Bhushans Tweets which were the Cause of Contempt as per the SC, Withheld by Twitter

By Harshil Jain      26 July, 2020 12:17 PM      0 Comments
Prashant Bhushan SC Twitter India

On Saturday, 25 July 2020, Twitter withheld two tweets of Prashant Bhushan dated 27 June 2020 and 29 June 2020 over which the Supreme Court of India issued him a notice for the contempt of court.

The tweets are not viewable and are hidden with the message This tweet from @pbhushan1 has been withheld in India in response to a legal demand 

On Thursday, 23 July 2020, Justice Arun Mishra, who was the presiding judge on the bench of three judges, had verbally asked Twitter Indias Counsel, Senior Advocate Sajan Poovayya, as to why Twitter had not taken down the tweets despite the SC initiating contempt proceedings over it. 

The Senior Counsel responded that Twitter did not defend Bhushans tweets and that the appropriate steps will be taken in that regard. 

The Supreme Court of India, while issuing notice to Prashant Bhushan over this matter, stated the prima facie view that the tweets of Prashant Bhushan have brought the administration of justice in disrepute and are capable of undermining the dignity and authority of the Institution of Supreme Court in general and the office of the Chief Justice of India in particular, in the eyes of the public at large 

In June this year, Mr. Bhushan alleged the judiciary had a hand in dealing with damage to democracy. On 27 June 2020, Prashant Bhushan accused the Supreme Court of playing a part in the "destruction of India's democracy" in the last six years. 

He tweeted, When historians in the future look back at the last 6 years to see how democracy has been destroyed in India even without a formal Emergency, they will particularly mark the role of the Supreme Court in this destruction, and more particularly the role of the last four CJIs.

His second tweet was posted on 29 June 2020 in which Prashant Bhushan posted a photograph of Chief Justice of India Sharad Arvind  Bobde sitting on a Harley Davidson motorcycle in Pune along with the text CJI rides a 50 Lakh motorcycle belonging to a BJP leader at Raj Bhavan Nagpur, without a mask or helmet, at a time when he keeps the SC in Lockdown mode denying citizens their fundamental right to access justice! 

In 2009, a contempt case was registered against Prashant Bhushan and Tarun Tejpal, who is the former editor of Tehelka magazine, is also listed before the same bench to be heard on Friday, 24 July 2020. 

The case relates to certain comments made by Bhushan in an interview to Tehelka magazine against former Chief Justice of India S H Kapadia. 

The Supreme Court contended that A petition was presented before us for contempt proceeding on the administrative side. We have gone through the petition and the allegation against CJI SA Bobde. The tweet in question was tweeted on June 27... We issue a notice to the Attorney General. We also note that the correct party here is Twitter Inc of California and not Twitter India. Twitter permitted to file an appropriate application.

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email