38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, November 11, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Petition Asks for Revocation of Adani and Maharashtra Government MoUs with Chinese Companies

By Ghazal Bhootra      02 July, 2020 07:31 PM      0 Comments
Petition Asks for Revocation ofAdani and Maharashtra GovernmentMoUswith Chinese Companies

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Supreme Court that has asked for the revocation of the $1 billion (approximately 75.59 crores) Memorandum of Understanding that was signed by the Maharashtra state government with Chinas Great Wall Motors.

Memorandum of Understandings (MoU) signed with several Chinese companies are the newest targets that have come to notice of the public after the recent rise of anti-China sentiment in the entire country.

The petition also comes at a time of rising tensions on the border between China and India, specifically about the Line of Actual Control (LAC).

The petition also happens to ask for the cancellation of the $300 million (approximately 22.68 Crores) Memorandum of Understanding that was signed between the Adani Group and Chinas East Hope Group for manufacturing solar power equipment in Mundra Special Economic Zone on June 20, 2017. The memorandum of understanding (MoU) signed had proposed to establish manufacturing units at Mundra special economic zone in Gujarat to produce solar power generation equipment, chemicals, aluminum, and animal feed, a statement by the Indian Consulate in Shanghai said.

The Petition was filed by, Supriya Pandita, a 25-year-old resident of Jammu. 

The public interest litigation also opined that conducting transactions for business with Chinese companies at a time when soldiers of our country were losing their lives at the border in conflicts with the Chines, was contradictory to the sentiment and will of the people of India.

Paying heed to the recent decision of the Indian government to disallow 59 Chinese apps and ban them, the petition stated that while such government measures were welcome, letting Memorandums of Understanding to be made with companies that were from China will effectively send a wrong message to the people of India.

The PIL went on to state that the national security threat referred to by the government to ban the 59 Chinese apps should be put in place uniformly. It should also apply to a cancellation of Memorandums with Chinese companies.

The government forbid 59 Chinese apps, including prominent social media companies such as TikTok, Helo, and WeChat, to oppose the threat posed by these mobile apps to the countrys sovereignty and security, it said in a press release on June 29, 2020. ShareIT, UC browser, and shopping apps Clubfactory and Shein are among the other prominent apps that have also been banned following the border clashes.

The government stated that these apps were engaged in activities prejudicial to sovereignty and integrity of India, defense of India, the security of the state and public order. The ban has been applied under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and read with relevant provisions of the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking of Access of Information by Public) Rules 2009, the government went on to say. The government also mentioned several complaints about the lack of data security and complaints of data of Indian users being transferred out of the country without permission. 

The plea has opined that discriminatory treatment for select businesses and select states to enter into transactions and sign memorandums of understanding with various Chinese organizations was opposed to Narendra Modis, Indias Prime Ministers call for Atmanirbhar Bharat.

Adani Group continues to state that the rumors that are circulating on social media concerning the signing of a $300 Million deal in a memorandum of understanding with the Chinese company East Hope Group in 2017 are outdated and essentially inaccurate. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

state-govt-cannot-appeal-in-cbi-prosecuted-cases-supreme-court-reaffirms-lalu-prasad-yadav-judgment
Trending Judiciary
State Govt Cannot Appeal In CBI-Prosecuted Cases: Supreme Court Reaffirms Lalu Prasad Yadav Judgment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court reaffirms Lalu Prasad Yadav ruling, holding that State Governments cannot appeal acquittals in CBI-investigated cases.

10 November, 2025 12:28 PM
managing-director-falls-within-definition-of-employer-under-minimum-wages-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Managing Director Falls Within Definition Of ‘Employer’ Under Minimum Wages Act: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that a Managing Director qualifies as an “employer” under the Minimum Wages Act, upholding liability for unpaid wages.

10 November, 2025 12:48 PM

TOP STORIES

instigation-for-suicide-need-not-be-compulsive-suggestive-words-enough-to-attract-section-306-ipc
Trending Judiciary
Instigation for Suicide Need Not Be Compulsive; Suggestive Words Enough to Attract Section 306 IPC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that instigation for suicide under Section 306 IPC need not be forceful; even suggestive words implying the consequence can attract liability.

05 November, 2025 04:10 PM
public-ground-cannot-be-reserved-for-any-religion-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Public Ground Cannot Be Reserved For Any Religion: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras HC rules public grounds cannot be reserved for any religion, allowing Annadhanam on village land and holding that law-and-order fears can’t curb fundamental rights.

05 November, 2025 05:10 PM
injunction-suit-without-declaration-of-title-not-maintainable-when-possession-lies-with-defendant-sc
Trending Judiciary
Injunction Suit Without Declaration Of Title Not Maintainable When Possession Lies With Defendant: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that an injunction suit without a declaration of title is not maintainable when possession rests with the defendant.

06 November, 2025 03:25 PM
when-multiple-documents-on-same-property-are-challenged-court-fee-payable-only-on-principal-relief-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
When Multiple Documents On Same Property Are Challenged, Court Fee Payable Only On Principal Relief: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that when multiple documents on the same property are challenged, court fee is payable only on the principal relief.

06 November, 2025 03:40 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email