38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Sahara group chairman Subrata Roy summoned by Supreme Court of India

By LawStreet News Network      01 February, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Sahara group chairman Subrata Roy summoned by Supreme Court of India

On Thursday, January, 31st 2019 Supreme Court of India ordered Sahara group chairman Subrata Roy to remain present in court on Thursday, February 28, 2019 to justify why no action should not be taken against him as the business group repeatedly failed to meet deadlines to deposit Rs 25,781 crore, which was directed by the apex court in August 2012.

The Bench comprising of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice A K Sikri and Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul of Supreme Court of India was notified by Sebi counsel Arvind Datar and Sahara counsel Vikas Singh that the group have deposited Rs 20,000 crore against the liability of Rs 25,781 crore. But, the bench refused to entertain Singhs plea that a substantial amount had been deposited but Sebi had not yet completed verifying the documents submitted by Sahara showing that there were no claims from investors for a refund. He said as money had been already returned to investors, the group's Rs 20,000 crore deposit with Sebi amounted to double charge.

On August 31, 2012, the Supreme Court of India directed the group to deposit the entire amount

The SC had on August 31, 2012, directed the group to deposit the entire amount with Sebi after cancelling the one-time fully convertible debentures floated by Sahara Real Estate and Sahara Housing, through which the amount was collected from three crore investors over the years. The SC had relaxed the deadline several times but these were breached as the group started paying in tranches.

Before asking Sahara group chairman Subrata Roy to be present in court bench said You have violated the courts orders. Why should the court show any more indulgence to you. If you dont deposit, the law will take its course. The amount was to be paid by March 2013. Appropriate order will be to ask the person responsible to appear in court and initiate appropriate action against him.

On March 4th, 2014 Subrata Roy was sent to jail by Supreme Court of India for committing contempt of court by violating its orders directing deposit of money with Sebi, where he remained in jail till May 2016. Later he was granted bail on promising to pay up the remaining amount within the fresh deadline fixed by the SC.

This plea was examined several times earlier and rejected. Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi said the court had already clearly stated in its orders that verification of documents submitted by Sahara would be taken up after the entire money was deposited.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email