38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, November 06, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Sahara group chairman Subrata Roy summoned by Supreme Court of India

By LawStreet News Network      01 February, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Sahara group chairman Subrata Roy summoned by Supreme Court of India

On Thursday, January, 31st 2019 Supreme Court of India ordered Sahara group chairman Subrata Roy to remain present in court on Thursday, February 28, 2019 to justify why no action should not be taken against him as the business group repeatedly failed to meet deadlines to deposit Rs 25,781 crore, which was directed by the apex court in August 2012.

The Bench comprising of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice A K Sikri and Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul of Supreme Court of India was notified by Sebi counsel Arvind Datar and Sahara counsel Vikas Singh that the group have deposited Rs 20,000 crore against the liability of Rs 25,781 crore. But, the bench refused to entertain Singhs plea that a substantial amount had been deposited but Sebi had not yet completed verifying the documents submitted by Sahara showing that there were no claims from investors for a refund. He said as money had been already returned to investors, the group's Rs 20,000 crore deposit with Sebi amounted to double charge.

On August 31, 2012, the Supreme Court of India directed the group to deposit the entire amount

The SC had on August 31, 2012, directed the group to deposit the entire amount with Sebi after cancelling the one-time fully convertible debentures floated by Sahara Real Estate and Sahara Housing, through which the amount was collected from three crore investors over the years. The SC had relaxed the deadline several times but these were breached as the group started paying in tranches.

Before asking Sahara group chairman Subrata Roy to be present in court bench said You have violated the courts orders. Why should the court show any more indulgence to you. If you dont deposit, the law will take its course. The amount was to be paid by March 2013. Appropriate order will be to ask the person responsible to appear in court and initiate appropriate action against him.

On March 4th, 2014 Subrata Roy was sent to jail by Supreme Court of India for committing contempt of court by violating its orders directing deposit of money with Sebi, where he remained in jail till May 2016. Later he was granted bail on promising to pay up the remaining amount within the fresh deadline fixed by the SC.

This plea was examined several times earlier and rejected. Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi said the court had already clearly stated in its orders that verification of documents submitted by Sahara would be taken up after the entire money was deposited.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

instigation-for-suicide-need-not-be-compulsive-suggestive-words-enough-to-attract-section-306-ipc
Trending Judiciary
Instigation for Suicide Need Not Be Compulsive; Suggestive Words Enough to Attract Section 306 IPC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that instigation for suicide under Section 306 IPC need not be forceful; even suggestive words implying the consequence can attract liability.

05 November, 2025 04:10 PM
public-ground-cannot-be-reserved-for-any-religion-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Public Ground Cannot Be Reserved For Any Religion: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras HC rules public grounds cannot be reserved for any religion, allowing Annadhanam on village land and holding that law-and-order fears can’t curb fundamental rights.

05 November, 2025 05:10 PM

TOP STORIES

hit-and-run-accident-case-sc-transfers-trial-involving-judicial-officer-from-punjab-to-delhi
Trending Judiciary
Hit-and-run accident case: SC transfers trial involving judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi

SC shifts hit-and-run case involving probationer judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi over alleged bias; orders potential further probe by Delhi Police.

31 October, 2025 11:27 AM
sc-issues-stern-warning-to-state-bar-councils-over-excessive-enrolment-fees-threatens-contempt-action
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Stern Warning To State Bar Councils Over Excessive Enrolment Fees, Threatens Contempt Action [Read Order]

SC warns State Bar Councils to stop charging over ₹750 enrollment fee or face contempt; directs BCI to issue circular, return applicants’ documents immediately.

31 October, 2025 11:32 AM
lawyers-cant-be-summoned-for-legal-advice-unless-covered-under-exceptions-of-sec-132-bsa-sc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers can't be summoned for legal advice unless covered under exceptions of Sec 132 BSA: SC

Supreme Court rules lawyers cannot be summoned for legal advice unless exceptions under Sec 132 BSA apply, safeguarding lawyer-client privilege and legal profession autonomy.

31 October, 2025 02:29 PM
conviction-us-138-ni-act-cannot-be-ground-to-stop-pension-madras-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Conviction U/S 138 NI Act Cannot Be Ground To Stop Pension: Madras High Court [Read Order]

Madras HC rules conviction under Section 138 NI Act is not moral turpitude and cannot justify stopping pension of retired employee; directs release of dues.

01 November, 2025 04:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email