38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, May 20, 2024

SAT Stays SEBI Order Banning NDTV Promoters From Securities Market; Next Hearing On Sep 16 [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      19 June, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
SAT Stays SEBI Order Banning NDTV Promoters From Securities Market; Next Hearing On Sep 16 [Read Order]

The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) on June 18, 2019, stayed an order passed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) barring New Delhi Television Ltd. (NDTV) promoters Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy from holding managerial or directorial positions at the news television network for two years.

“Such orders prima facie would not be in the interest of the shareholders of NDTV or investors at this stage,” SAT said in an order, adding the company “cannot remain headless.”

The tribunal directed the Roys to not alienate or create any encumbrance on their shareholding in NDTV till further orders.

The order pertains to Rs 350-crore loan taken by holding company RRPR Holding from ICICI Bank, which was later liquidated by taking two more loans from Vishvapradhan Commercial (VCPL). The loan taken from VCPL was interest-free for 10 years on the condition that VCPL would have a right of first refusal on 50 per cent of NDTV shares in the event they were sold in the market. The loan agreement had certain call options for transfer of 30 per cent of RRPR shareholding at a price of around Rs 215 per share.

SEBI, in its order dated June 14, 2019, said the loan agreement was nothing but a sham agreement, and violated disclosure norms.

Hearing both the parties, the tribunal, however, observed that whether the loan agreement was a sham transaction or not and whether the loan agreement, in fact, wrested control of NDTV to VCPL is a question which is required to be considered in detail.

The tribunal pulled up SEBI for not supplying a copy of the order to the Roys.

“We find the whole world knows about the impugned order except the appellants. To date, they have not been supplied a copy of the impugned order despite the oral direction given by this tribunal yesterday (Monday)... Their liability and their onerous duty does not end the moment they upload the order on their website. The first duty is to supply a copy of the impugned order to the aggrieved party, which, in the instant case, has not been done to date,” said SAT.

The tribunal, while listing the matter for final disposal on September 16, 2019, directed SEBI to file a reply and gave three weeks to the Roys to file a rejoinder.

[Read Order]

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea for stay on new criminal laws

SC refuses plea to stay new criminal laws. Court deems the plea casual, noting laws aren't yet implemented. Petitioner withdraws. Laws effective from July 1, 2024.

20 May, 2024 12:58 PM
Trending Know The Law
SCBA Election Result 2024, Know the newly elected members

SCBA Election Result 2024: Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal elected President. Know the newly elected members and key office bearers leading the Supreme Court Bar Association.

20 May, 2024 03:03 PM


Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice to ED on Hemant Soren's Plea Against Arrest in Land Scam

Supreme Court issues notice to ED on Hemant Soren's plea against arrest in a land scam case, sets hearing for May 17 after senior advocate Kapil Sibal's request for an earlier date.

14 May, 2024 11:24 AM
Trending Environment
3,800 metric tonnes of solid wastes going untreated everyday in Delhi SC records concern

The Supreme Court expressed concern as 3,800 metric tonnes of solid waste in Delhi go untreated daily. The issue must be addressed promptly beyond political lines.

14 May, 2024 11:30 AM
Trending Judiciary
Plea filed in SC for review of April 26 EVM VVPAT verdict

A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court to review its April 26 verdict on EVM VVPAT verification, challenging the decision that dismissed a demand for 100% vote cross-verification.

14 May, 2024 12:13 PM
Trending Judiciary
AI can’t detect consent Microsoft and Google tell Delhi High Court

Microsoft and Google tell Delhi HC that AI can't detect consent for NCII takedowns, challenging a 24-hour removal directive under IT Act's safe harbour protections.

14 May, 2024 01:33 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email