38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

SBI Issues Clarification on Levying Charges on Zero Balance Accounts

By Tanya Sehrawat      19 April, 2021 03:13 PM      0 Comments
SBI Issues Clarification on Levying Charges on Zero Balance Accounts

A clarification was issued by the State Bank of India (SBI) on Thursday (April 15, 2021), post a recent study claiming that the bank was levying 'unreasonable' charges for various services provided to zero-balance account or basic savings bank deposit (BSBD) account holders. 

It was claimed by the study that the decision by SBI to levy a charge of Rs 17.70 for every debit transaction beyond the four free transactions in a month on BSBD accounts cannot be considered as fair and reasonable.

It was said in the statement of SBI the fact that banks were free to charge reasonable fees on services after four debit transactions a month was announced by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in August, 2012. Following this, charges for debit transactions beyond four free transactions in BSBD accounts were issued by SBI, with an effect from June 14, 2016 with prior intimation to the customers.

The banks were advised to refund all fees collected from account holders for making digital transactions on or after January 1, 2020 by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in August 2020. In order to encourage cashless transactions, it also asked banks not to collect any further charges for digital transactions from account holders. 

This suggestion from the CBDT found its base from a previous directive from the RBI that was released in August 2019. Banks were also asked to provide basic minimum services to BSBD account holders without levying any fees on such services by the RBI directive. This was with respect to inclusion of depositing cash and four minimum monthly withdrawals.

Refund of charges collected for all digital transactions to the BSBD account holders with effect from January 1, 2020 to September 14, 2020 was claimed by SBI. It had reportedly stopped recovering charges in such accounts on all digital transactions from September 15, 2020 onwards.

However, the charges on all debit withdrawals after four free transactions in a month are still retained by SBI. 

Aiding cashless transactions, being the main motive, BSBD account holders including Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojna (PMJDY) account holders were supposed to be encouraged for the same, by the charges that were levied. 

Fees levied on SMS services and on maintenance of monthly average balance to all its Savings Bank account holders has also been waived by the Bank. 

SBI said in its statement, Customer Centricity has always been the Banks focus. SBI has been determinedly working towards offering a convenient banking experience to all its diverse range of customers.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email