38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 01, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

SC sets aside judgment upholding arbitral award against DMRC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      11 April, 2024 11:43 AM      0 Comments
SC sets aside judgment upholding arbitral award against DMRC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday set aside an arbitral award directing the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) to pay nearly Rs 8,000 crore to Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure subsidiary, Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited (DAMEPL).

A bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices B R Gavai and Surya Kant allowed the curative petition against its previous judgment.

There was no valid basis for this court to interfere in Article 136 of the Constitution. The interference by this court has resulted in restoring a patently illegal award and cause grave miscarriage of justice, the bench said.

While in September 2021, the Supreme Court had upheld the arbitration award including interest, in favour of DAMEPL, it had dismissed a review petition filed by DMRC in November 2021. Later in August 2022, DMRC filed a curative petition in the Supreme Court.

The principal amount of award was Rs 3,000 Cr which got increased to Rs 8,000 Cr due to interests.

The bench said that its earlier bench, which interfered with the Delhi High Courts division benchs decision of January 15, 2019 had resulted in a grave miscarriage of justice in directing DMRC to honour the arbitration award.

The execution proceedings before the HC for enforcing the arbitral award must be discontinued and the amounts deposited by DMRC pursuant to the judgment of this court shall be refunded. The part of the awarded amount, if any, paid by DMRC as a result of coercive action is liable to be restored in its favour, the court ordered.

In its judgment, the bench clarified that the exercise of the curative jurisdiction of this court should not be adopted as a matter of ordinary course.

The curative jurisdiction should not be used to open the floodgates and create a fourth or fifth stage of court intervention in an arbitral award, under this courts review jurisdiction or curative jurisdiction, respectively, the bench said.

DMRC was aggrieved with an arbitral award directing it to pay Reliance Infrastructure subsidiary, DAMEPL.

The DMRC had lost its appeal challenging the award in the top court in September 2021. After which, DAMEPL moved the Delhi High Court to execute the award. In August last year, the apex court had asked the high court to defer the proceedings till a decision on the curative plea was made.

Attorney general R Venkataramani and senior advocate K K Venugopal, for the public sector DMRC, contended after the termination of the contract, the airport line has been successfully operated by DMRC since July 2013.

DAMEPL had raised safety issues in continuing with the contract to operate the 22.7km Airport Metro Express line, after which DMRC cancelled the contract in October 2012.

A joint public private partnership to build, operate and run the Airport Express line was made on August 25, 2008 between Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) and DAMEPL. However, the pact fell apart over some defects in the line which were allegedly not cured by DMRC. DAMEPL then pulled out from running the Metro line over safety issues. While DMRC has been running the Airport Express line since 2013, it had taken the case to arbitration and an award was given in favour of DAMEPL.

The arbitral tribunal in its May 2017 award had accepted DAMEPLs claim that the running of operations on the line was not viable due to structural defects in the viaduct through which the train would run. The award asked DMRC to pay nearly Rs 3,000 crore, along with interest.

On September 9, 2021, the apex court had dismissed a plea by Delhi Metro Rail Corporation against the arbitration award in favour of debt-laden Reliance Group, ADAG, after a four-year battle for control of money secured following a dispute on running of Delhi Airport Express Metro line.

The court had then held that the Delhi High Court was not right in interfering with the award of May 11, 2017 passed in favour of Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt Ltd, a subsidiary of Reliance Infrastructure.

 

[Read Judgment]

 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

calcutta-hc-dismisses-pil-challenging-ecis-mass-transfer-of-officers-in-west-bengal
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Dismisses PIL Challenging ECI’s Mass Transfer of Officers in West Bengal [Read Judgment]

Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL challenging ECI’s mass transfer of officers in West Bengal, upholding its powers under Article 324.

31 March, 2026 05:49 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM
karnataka-hc-quashes-fir-against-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-in-bengaluru-land-encroachment-case
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes FIR Against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar In Bengaluru Land Encroachment Case

Karnataka HC quashes FIR against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in Bengaluru land encroachment case, holding no direct role and limiting relief to him alone.

26 March, 2026 03:00 PM
sc-dismisses-challenge-to-mha-circular-on-vande-mataram-terms-apprehensions-premature
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses Challenge to MHA Circular on ‘Vande Mataram’; Terms Apprehensions Premature

Supreme Court dismisses plea against MHA’s ‘Vande Mataram’ circular, calls concerns premature as directive is advisory with no mandatory or penal effect.

26 March, 2026 04:46 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email