38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, November 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

SC sets aside judgment upholding arbitral award against DMRC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      11 April, 2024 11:43 AM      0 Comments
SC sets aside judgment upholding arbitral award against DMRC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday set aside an arbitral award directing the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) to pay nearly Rs 8,000 crore to Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure subsidiary, Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited (DAMEPL).

A bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices B R Gavai and Surya Kant allowed the curative petition against its previous judgment.

There was no valid basis for this court to interfere in Article 136 of the Constitution. The interference by this court has resulted in restoring a patently illegal award and cause grave miscarriage of justice, the bench said.

While in September 2021, the Supreme Court had upheld the arbitration award including interest, in favour of DAMEPL, it had dismissed a review petition filed by DMRC in November 2021. Later in August 2022, DMRC filed a curative petition in the Supreme Court.

The principal amount of award was Rs 3,000 Cr which got increased to Rs 8,000 Cr due to interests.

The bench said that its earlier bench, which interfered with the Delhi High Courts division benchs decision of January 15, 2019 had resulted in a grave miscarriage of justice in directing DMRC to honour the arbitration award.

The execution proceedings before the HC for enforcing the arbitral award must be discontinued and the amounts deposited by DMRC pursuant to the judgment of this court shall be refunded. The part of the awarded amount, if any, paid by DMRC as a result of coercive action is liable to be restored in its favour, the court ordered.

In its judgment, the bench clarified that the exercise of the curative jurisdiction of this court should not be adopted as a matter of ordinary course.

The curative jurisdiction should not be used to open the floodgates and create a fourth or fifth stage of court intervention in an arbitral award, under this courts review jurisdiction or curative jurisdiction, respectively, the bench said.

DMRC was aggrieved with an arbitral award directing it to pay Reliance Infrastructure subsidiary, DAMEPL.

The DMRC had lost its appeal challenging the award in the top court in September 2021. After which, DAMEPL moved the Delhi High Court to execute the award. In August last year, the apex court had asked the high court to defer the proceedings till a decision on the curative plea was made.

Attorney general R Venkataramani and senior advocate K K Venugopal, for the public sector DMRC, contended after the termination of the contract, the airport line has been successfully operated by DMRC since July 2013.

DAMEPL had raised safety issues in continuing with the contract to operate the 22.7km Airport Metro Express line, after which DMRC cancelled the contract in October 2012.

A joint public private partnership to build, operate and run the Airport Express line was made on August 25, 2008 between Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) and DAMEPL. However, the pact fell apart over some defects in the line which were allegedly not cured by DMRC. DAMEPL then pulled out from running the Metro line over safety issues. While DMRC has been running the Airport Express line since 2013, it had taken the case to arbitration and an award was given in favour of DAMEPL.

The arbitral tribunal in its May 2017 award had accepted DAMEPLs claim that the running of operations on the line was not viable due to structural defects in the viaduct through which the train would run. The award asked DMRC to pay nearly Rs 3,000 crore, along with interest.

On September 9, 2021, the apex court had dismissed a plea by Delhi Metro Rail Corporation against the arbitration award in favour of debt-laden Reliance Group, ADAG, after a four-year battle for control of money secured following a dispute on running of Delhi Airport Express Metro line.

The court had then held that the Delhi High Court was not right in interfering with the award of May 11, 2017 passed in favour of Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt Ltd, a subsidiary of Reliance Infrastructure.

 

[Read Judgment]

 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

mere-use-of-word-arbitration-does-not-create-valid-arbitration-agreement-sc
Trending Judiciary
Mere Use of Word “Arbitration” Does Not Create Valid Arbitration Agreement: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that mere use of the word “arbitration” in a contract clause doesn’t constitute a valid arbitration agreement without clear intent.

08 November, 2025 01:14 PM
sc-issues-notice-on-plea-seeking-one-third-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice on Plea Seeking One-Third Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils [Read Order]

Supreme Court issues notice on plea seeking one-third reservation for women in all State Bar Councils to ensure gender equality in legal governance.

08 November, 2025 01:39 PM

TOP STORIES

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM
government-cannot-unilaterally-expand-labour-dispute-scope-without-workers-demand-himachal-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Government cannot unilaterally expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Government cannot suo motu expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand, rules Himachal Pradesh High Court, holding termination issues need separate notice.

03 November, 2025 04:21 PM
child-welfare-committee-cannot-direct-police-to-register-fir-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Welfare Committee Cannot Direct Police to Register FIR: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Child Welfare Committees cannot direct police to register FIRs, rules Allahabad High Court, holding their powers are limited to children needing care and protection.

03 November, 2025 04:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email